Back to leads
Est. value
Not listed
Units
Not listed
Floor area
Not listed
Received
28 Aug 2026
Direct applicationCase is due to be decided by 18/02/2027
Hodson Bay, Townland of Barrymore, Co. Roscommon
Roscommon / Roscommon County Council
Key facts
Lead summary
- Commission case reference
- 324610
- Case type
- LA Non Road Dev - Application
- Planning authority
- Roscommon County Council
- Status
- Case is due to be decided by 18/02/2027
- Received
- 28 Aug 2026
Official description
Verbatim source text
Hodson Bay Waterfront Park Project
Verify against official sourceReviewed build intelligence
What the documents propose
Direct application pending
Application proposals inspected on 5 September 2026. No decision, procurement appointment, commencement or installed specification is established by this review.
3 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-05 · Official file index
Heat pumps, VRF and heat recovery are proposed
Proposed in application · Water-sports pavilion and café only
What the evidence says
The pavilion and café propose all-electric ASHP/VRF space heating and cooling, fan-coil units, dedicated heat-pump hot water with storage, and heat-recovery ventilation.
Water-sports pavilion and café only
Why it may matter — interpretation
Identifies an actual services package to follow through to detailed design.
What is not established
Central or local ventilation arrangements await detailed design. This is a planning strategy, not final BER or installation evidence.
Inspect the evidence
Hodson Bay Energy Statement · p.4
Mechanical ventilation with heat recovery · Issued 2026-08-05 · 71589-CIV-XX-XX-R-J-50001, revision 04 Final for Planning; cover says July 2026, revision table governs · Checked 2026-09-05
Mechanical ventilation with heat recovery
54 roof panels are proposed across the two buildings
Proposed in application · Water-sports pavilion roof and café roof only
What the evidence says
45 panels on the pavilion and 9 on the café give 54 panels, 108 m² and 21.6 kWp assuming 400 W per panel. The estimate is 16–20 MWh annually; no battery is proposed.
Water-sports pavilion roof and café roof only
Why it may matter — interpretation
Identifies the stated renewable-energy provision and its exact building scope.
What is not established
Panel efficiency and detailed electrical arrangements remain to be confirmed; this is proposed capacity, not generation measured on site.
Inspect the evidence
Hodson Bay Energy Statement · p.13
totalling 54 panels · Issued 2026-08-05 · 71589-CIV-XX-XX-R-J-50001, revision 04 Final for Planning; cover says July 2026, revision table governs · Checked 2026-09-05
totalling 54 panels
The report specifies fabric-performance targets
Proposed in application · Conditioned building envelope of the pavilion and café
What the evidence says
Targets are 0.10 W/m²K for the floor, 0.12 for the roof, 0.13 for external walls and 1.2 for double glazing. The airtightness target is 3.0 m³/(h·m²) at 50 Pa.
Conditioned building envelope of the pavilion and café
Why it may matter — interpretation
Records design targets that can be checked against later approved construction details.
What is not established
These are design targets. Final product data, buildable details and testing have not been reviewed.
Inspect the evidence
Hodson Bay Energy Statement · p.9
proposed U-values · Issued 2026-08-05 · 71589-CIV-XX-XX-R-J-50001, revision 04 Final for Planning; cover says July 2026, revision table governs · Checked 2026-09-05
proposed U-values
A scoped SuDS design uses permeable surfaces and planted features
Proposed in application · Approximately 3.73 ha developed waterfront and marina catchment
What the evidence says
The waterfront/marina strategy combines permeable surfacing, rain gardens, bioretention and structural-cell tree pits. Existing lake outfalls require condition/capacity confirmation; non-return valves and hydrocarbon interceptors are proposed.
Approximately 3.73 ha developed waterfront and marina catchment
Why it may matter — interpretation
Identifies the proposed engineering approach and the limits of its assessed catchment.
What is not established
The 5.07 ha active-travel corridor is excluded from the hydraulic model and retains existing drainage. This review does not establish construction or agreed final drainage.
Inspect the evidence
Hodson Bay Engineering Report · p.28
permeable and porous surfacing · Issued 2026-07-31 · 31022-RP-CIV-CE-00101, revision 01 Planning · Checked 2026-09-05
permeable and porous surfacing
Hodson Bay Engineering Report · p.29
Additional estimated storage · Issued 2026-07-31 · 31022-RP-CIV-CE-00101, revision 01 Planning · Checked 2026-09-05
Additional estimated storage
Modelled and additional estimated storage are reported separately
Proposed in application · The waterfront/marina hydraulic assessment only
What the evidence says
The model includes about 1,470 m³ of storage; another 606 m³ is an additional estimate for tree pits and bioretention. They are not presented here as one verified modelled total.
The waterfront/marina hydraulic assessment only
Why it may matter — interpretation
Identifies the proposed engineering approach and the limits of its assessed catchment.
What is not established
The report requires further survey and detailed design. Its modelled discharge remains above the stated greenfield rate.
Inspect the evidence
Hodson Bay Engineering Report · p.28
permeable and porous surfacing · Issued 2026-07-31 · 31022-RP-CIV-CE-00101, revision 01 Planning · Checked 2026-09-05
permeable and porous surfacing
Hodson Bay Engineering Report · p.29
Additional estimated storage · Issued 2026-07-31 · 31022-RP-CIV-CE-00101, revision 01 Planning · Checked 2026-09-05
Additional estimated storage
2700K lighting and dimming are proposed
Proposed in application · External lighting covered by the submitted report
What the evidence says
The draft specifies warm-white 2700 K LED luminaires, U23 dimming compatibility and optical shielding near sensitive areas.
External lighting covered by the submitted report
Why it may matter — interpretation
Identifies a named product or control requirement in the submitted design.
What is not established
The document is a design-development draft. No approved final lighting package or installed performance is established.
Inspect the evidence
Hodson Bay External Lighting Report · p.4
2700 K · Issued August 2026 (month only) · Draft for Planning / Design Development; month-only report date. Appendix drawing is dated 20 August 2026; no day inferred for the whole report. · Checked 2026-09-05
2700 K
Hodson Bay External Lighting Report · p.17
Compatibility with the U23 dimming profile · Issued August 2026 (month only) · Draft for Planning / Design Development; month-only report date. Appendix drawing is dated 20 August 2026; no day inferred for the whole report. · Checked 2026-09-05
Compatibility with the U23 dimming profile
The appendix names a Holophane Pebble fitting
Proposed in application · Item A1 only; not every lighting zone
What the evidence says
Item A1 identifies Holophane Pebble PEB.1.LM102.FWE.PT1.C7.NIR with 2700 K output and a 6 m post-top column.
Item A1 only; not every lighting zone
Why it may matter — interpretation
Identifies a named product or control requirement in the submitted design.
What is not established
This is a named fitting in the submitted design, not an appointment, order or installed-product claim. No whole-site quantity is inferred.
Inspect the evidence
Hodson Bay External Lighting Report · p.43
Item Ref: A1 · Issued August 2026 (month only) · Draft for Planning / Design Development; month-only report date. Appendix drawing is dated 20 August 2026; no day inferred for the whole report. · Checked 2026-09-05
Item Ref: A1
Hodson Bay External Lighting Report · p.44
Holophane Pebble luminaire · Issued August 2026 (month only) · Draft for Planning / Design Development; month-only report date. Appendix drawing is dated 20 August 2026; no day inferred for the whole report. · Checked 2026-09-05
Holophane Pebble luminaire
Remaining document questions
- Which later official decision, approved detail or revision changes these source-specific findings?
- Has a phase-specific official record established the selected equipment or installed specification?
Selected pages of 3 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Three distinct official PDFs; selected technical and revision pages inspected, not all pages or all files. The complete official case index was freshly rechecked. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.
Likely trades & supplier leads