The August council notification is a decision to grant rather than final permission. It states 227 homes, while its detailed house-type breakdown is internally inconsistent; the original 229 headline must not be read as a reconciled current count.
The decision states 227 homes; detailed type counts need reconciliation
Council decision and submitted design; final grant not established
What the evidence says
The August notification describes 227 residential units comprising 192 houses and 35 apartments. The June phasing drawing also totals 227 through 98 and 129 units. The notification’s detailed house-type list sums differently, so it does not support an unqualified reconciled type breakdown. The notice expressly requires a later final grant before development is authorised.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Planning and commercial review should obtain the operative reconciled schedule before using the earlier headline or house-type figures for quantities.
What is not established
Final grant, a reconciled detailed accommodation schedule, procurement quantities and commencement are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Notification of decision to grant LRD permission · p.1
227 residential units; 192 houses and 35 apartments; detailed house types · Issued 2026-08-12 · Order 10 August; notification signed 12 August; catalogue 13 August; 53 conditions in document · Checked 2026-09-07
227 residential units; 192 houses and 35 apartments; detailed house types
Notification of decision to grant LRD permission · p.2
Until a Grant ... NOT AUTHORISED · Issued 2026-08-12 · Order 10 August; notification signed 12 August; catalogue 13 August; 53 conditions in document · Checked 2026-09-07
Until a Grant ... NOT AUTHORISED
Further-information proposed phasing plan · p.1
Phase 1: 98 units; Phase 2: 129 units · Issued 2026-06-04 · 23172/P/011 revision P2; received 15 June; two-phase proposal subject to later condition 4 · Checked 2026-09-07
Phase 1: 98 units; Phase 2: 129 units
The two-phase FI drawing requires revision under the later decision
August condition governs the earlier June phasing proposal
What the evidence says
The June P2 drawing proposes two phases, with the farmhouse and active-travel route included in Phase 1. Decision condition 4 instead requires the original three-phase basis unless otherwise agreed and a revised strategy identifying each phase. It requires the farmhouse complex, sustainable travel link and the full northern noise barrier and associated landscaping in Phase 1.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Enabling, conservation, landscape and acoustic packages need to be sequenced against an agreed revised strategy rather than the two-colour drawing alone.
What is not established
Written acceptance of a revised phasing strategy, final grant and delivery of any phase are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Further-information proposed phasing plan · p.1
Proposed two-phase plan revision P2 · Issued 2026-06-04 · 23172/P/011 revision P2; received 15 June; two-phase proposal subject to later condition 4 · Checked 2026-09-07
Proposed two-phase plan revision P2
Notification of decision to grant LRD permission · p.5
Condition 4: original three-phase phasing plan; Phase 1 requirements · Issued 2026-08-12 · Order 10 August; notification signed 12 August; catalogue 13 August; 53 conditions in document · Checked 2026-09-07
Condition 4: original three-phase phasing plan; Phase 1 requirements
Compound location and the parent crèche control phase sequencing
Decision conditions linking the new phase to existing estate infrastructure
What the evidence says
Condition 4 requires relocation of the construction compound away from open space and the farmhouse character area into a later phase, without obstructing pedestrian or cycling routes. The crèche permitted under 22/04809 must be operational before Phase 1 completion, and Phase 2 cannot start without the council’s written agreement.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Site-logistics and childcare delivery teams need these dependencies in the mobilisation and handover programme.
What is not established
A compound agreement, completed crèche, permission to begin Phase 2 and actual construction starts are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Notification of decision to grant LRD permission · p.5
Condition 4: compound, crèche and Phase 2 agreement · Issued 2026-08-12 · Order 10 August; notification signed 12 August; catalogue 13 August; 53 conditions in document · Checked 2026-09-07
Condition 4: compound, crèche and Phase 2 agreement
The northern noise barrier must precede occupation
Acoustic requirement in the August decision
What the evidence says
Condition 6 requires full implementation of the Noise Mitigation Implementation Plan and completion of the noise barrier and associated landscaping in Phase 1 before any dwelling is occupied. This makes the acoustic boundary a delivery prerequisite rather than optional later landscaping.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Acoustic-fence and landscape suppliers should coordinate the continuous northern treatment with the first residential handover.
What is not established
Barrier product, final detailed agreement, installation, acoustic testing and occupation are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Notification of decision to grant LRD permission · p.6
Condition 6: noise barrier and landscaping before occupation · Issued 2026-08-12 · Order 10 August; notification signed 12 August; catalogue 13 August; 53 conditions in document · Checked 2026-09-07
Condition 6: noise barrier and landscaping before occupation
Two internal road sections need cul-de-sac revisions with active travel links
Required road and public-realm revision
What the evidence says
Condition 8 requires revised layouts for the road north of dwellings 1021 to 1027 and north-east of dwellings 1028 to 1036. The layouts must preserve pedestrian and cycle connectivity and incorporate landscaping, shared-surface or home-zone measures, seating and trees, subject to written agreement before commencement.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Civil and landscape contractors need the agreed layout before fixing kerbs, paving, levels and planting quantities.
What is not established
An agreed revised layout, construction setting-out drawings and completed roads are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Notification of decision to grant LRD permission · p.6
Condition 8: cul-de-sac arrangements and pedestrian/cyclist connectivity · Issued 2026-08-12 · Order 10 August; notification signed 12 August; catalogue 13 August; 53 conditions in document · Checked 2026-09-07
Condition 8: cul-de-sac arrangements and pedestrian/cyclist connectivity
The declared pages of these government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Other catalogue files, later compliance, procurement and installed specifications were not established. Historical weekly membership is retained separately from these document dates.