Council decision dated 22 July 2026 is under Commission appeal 501889. The order limits the scheme to 22 houses and requires revised drainage and design approvals; no final permission or completed works are established.
The council decision permits 22 houses, not the original 24
Council condition under appeal; compliance not established · F25A/1069E; original application and conditioned version are separate
What the evidence says
The signed chief executive’s order is dated 22 July 2026. Condition 3 permits 22 houses only, while the introductory application description still states 24. The order incorporates the April additional information and June clarification. The exact Commission case 501889 records an appeal lodged on 14 August; the council decision is not presented as an unchallenged final grant.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: prevents the old notice description being mistaken for the council-conditioned quantity.
What is not established
The Commission outcome, final permission, commencement and built quantity are not established.
Inspect the evidence
F25A/1069E: chief executive’s order and assessment · p.38
22 no. houses only · Issued 2026-07-22 · Signed final order on page 47; earlier January/April assessments remain within this consolidated document; 24 final conditions after handwritten amendment · Checked 2026-09-06
22 no. houses only
The SuDS basin must be omitted and an alternative agreed
Council condition under appeal; compliance not established · Council condition 13 spans pages 41–42; original basin is not the accepted final detail
What the evidence says
Condition 13 requires the proposed basin to be omitted to preserve usable public open space. An acceptable alternative drainage proposal, including calculations for the public-open-space area beside Kitestown Road, must be agreed before commencement. Revised drainage and landscaping must be coordinated with the transport section; surface water must remain separate from foul drainage.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: identifies a changed drainage package and its remaining approval dependency.
What is not established
The alternative drainage design, agreed calculations and installed system have not been inspected.
Inspect the evidence
F25A/1069E: chief executive’s order and assessment · p.41
basin SuDs feature · Issued 2026-07-22 · Signed final order on page 47; earlier January/April assessments remain within this consolidated document; 24 final conditions after handwritten amendment · Checked 2026-09-06
basin SuDs feature
Final materials need brochures and written agreement
Council condition under appeal; compliance not established · Condition 8; final external finishes submission
What the evidence says
Condition 8 requires full external-treatment details for all buildings before commencement, submitted as trade brochures or details clearly identifying material type and colour. The inspected order does not establish a selected manufacturer or an agreed final facade schedule.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: separates a required technical submission from a confirmed product selection.
What is not established
Final approved colours, material products, quantities and procurement are not established.
Inspect the evidence
F25A/1069E: chief executive’s order and assessment · p.39
trade brochures/details · Issued 2026-07-22 · Signed final order on page 47; earlier January/April assessments remain within this consolidated document; 24 final conditions after handwritten amendment · Checked 2026-09-06
trade brochures/details
Lighting needs product data and a seven-metre tree clearance
Council condition under appeal; compliance not established · Condition 16; lighting-layout and equipment submission requirements
What the evidence says
Condition 16 requires agreement with the public-lighting section, scaled column and section-pillar locations, and at least 7 m clearance between trees and lighting columns. It requires product data and drawings for luminaires, columns, cables, ducting, pillars and access chambers, plus a council LED technical sheet for each proposed luminaire.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: identifies the actual design package and landscape coordination requirement.
What is not established
A final accepted layout, luminaire make/model/count and installation are not verified.
Inspect the evidence
F25A/1069E: chief executive’s order and assessment · p.43
7m minimum clearance · Issued 2026-07-22 · Signed final order on page 47; earlier January/April assessments remain within this consolidated document; 24 final conditions after handwritten amendment · Checked 2026-09-06
7m minimum clearance
The layout must be revised around retained trees
Council condition under appeal; compliance not established · Condition 6 following clarification of additional information
What the evidence says
Condition 6 calls for an updated tree-impact plan retaining the trees identified by the parks and green-infrastructure report of 16 July. Those trees must be retained and monitored where needed for public safety, and a revised layout must be submitted for written approval while retaining stated setbacks unless otherwise agreed.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: keeps a landscape-driven layout revision visible alongside the reduced house quantity.
What is not established
The accepted revised layout and completed tree-protection works have not been inspected.
Inspect the evidence
F25A/1069E: chief executive’s order and assessment · p.39
updated Tree Impact Plan · Issued 2026-07-22 · Signed final order on page 47; earlier January/April assessments remain within this consolidated document; 24 final conditions after handwritten amendment · Checked 2026-09-06
updated Tree Impact Plan
The order requires underground services and broadband ducting
Council condition under appeal; compliance not established · Condition 22; service routing within the development
What the evidence says
Condition 22 requires public services, including electrical and telecommunications cables, to be underground throughout the site. It separately requires ducting to facilitate broadband infrastructure. This is a council condition, not evidence of installed connections or a service-provider contract.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: identifies a defined enabling-services requirement without adding equipment quantities.
What is not established
Detailed utility approvals, route lengths, completed ducts and live service connections remain unverified.
Inspect the evidence
F25A/1069E: chief executive’s order and assessment · p.45
located underground · Issued 2026-07-22 · Signed final order on page 47; earlier January/April assessments remain within this consolidated document; 24 final conditions after handwritten amendment · Checked 2026-09-06
located underground
Selected pages of 1 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. The normal council UI reported 205 documents. Selected pages of one 47-page combined order/report were visually reviewed; other documents and the complete earlier assessments were not inspected. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.