Council decision dated 31 July 2026 with 25 conditions. Official Commission case 501985 records an appeal lodged on 27 August 2026, due by 8 January 2027. The original technical report predates later amendments and no final grant or commencement is established.
A 50-home council decision with later amendments
Council condition; appeal pending · Exact council reference 25/60638; decision scope under appeal
What the evidence says
The 31 July 2026 decision describes 50 homes: ten two-bedroom duplex units, 32 three-bedroom houses and eight four-bedroom houses. Condition 1 incorporates further information received on 23 April and 7 July 2026. The original engineering report predates those revisions.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: separates the stated housing scope from the age of the original technical design.
What is not established
The pending appeal, final permission, detailed compliance and commencement are not resolved by this council decision.
Inspect the evidence
Glendine Way: council decision and 25 conditions · p.1
50 no. residential units · Issued 2026-07-31 · Council decision; April and July 2026 amendments incorporated · Checked 2026-09-05
50 no. residential units
Glendine Way: council decision and 25 conditions · p.3
23/04/’26 and 07/07/’26 · Issued 2026-07-31 · Council decision; April and July 2026 amendments incorporated · Checked 2026-09-05
23/04/’26 and 07/07/’26
LED lighting with 3000 K and programmable controls
Council condition; appeal pending · Public lighting condition for this development; no selected luminaire model or installed count
What the evidence says
Condition 5(j) requires the final lighting design to be agreed. It specifies energy-efficient LEDs, central-management compatibility using seven-pin NEMA sockets or an equivalent, warm-white 3000 K light, programmable NFC drivers and DALI cabling, and the residential U15 dimming profile. The lantern type must be agreed and registered on the SEAI Triple E register.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: exposes an evidenced controls and commissioning package while keeping final design approval open.
What is not established
An agreed lantern, supplier order, installation or commissioned dimming profile was not established.
Inspect the evidence
Glendine Way: council decision and 25 conditions · p.5
7pin NEMA sockets · Issued 2026-07-31 · Council decision; April and July 2026 amendments incorporated · Checked 2026-09-05
7pin NEMA sockets
A water connection agreement is required before the final grant
Council condition; appeal pending · Later council condition and explicitly earlier water-network design
What the evidence says
Condition 10(f) requires evidence of a signed Uisce Éireann public-water connection agreement before the final grant. The September 2025 engineering report had proposed a new connection because the existing spur was unsuitable after the entrance adjustment, and said feasibility confirmation was still awaited.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: identifies a delivery dependency without treating the old enquiry as an approved connection.
What is not established
A signed agreement, a later feasibility response, final connection location and completed works were not established.
Inspect the evidence
Glendine Way: council decision and 25 conditions · p.6
Prior to the final Grant · Issued 2026-07-31 · Council decision; April and July 2026 amendments incorporated · Checked 2026-09-05
Prior to the final Grant
Glendine Way: Engineering Services Design Report · p.21
confirmation of feasibility is awaited · Issued 2025-09-10 · Revision 00, P3 Planning; cover says July 2025, control sheet dates planning issue 10 September; received 2025-10-01 · Checked 2026-09-05
confirmation of feasibility is awaited
An original gravity and infiltration drainage strategy
Original design; later amendments require reconciliation · Original application design only; later amended drawings not fully reconciled
What the evidence says
The original engineering report proposes gravity pipes from roads and paving to swales, rain gardens and engineered infiltration areas. Its stormwater simulations include the one-in-100-year event with a 20% climate allowance. This is the September 2025 planning issue, before the April and July 2026 amendments incorporated into the council decision.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: gives a traceable drainage strategy and its revision boundary.
What is not established
The final amended layout, installed storage, infiltration performance and construction detail were not established.
Inspect the evidence
Glendine Way: Engineering Services Design Report · p.18
direct infiltration to ground · Issued 2025-09-10 · Revision 00, P3 Planning; cover says July 2025, control sheet dates planning issue 10 September; received 2025-10-01 · Checked 2026-09-05
direct infiltration to ground
A named separator and modular soakaway in the original design
Original design; later amendments require reconciliation · September 2025 report; no confirmation that this product survived later amendments
What the evidence says
The original report names a Kingspan Klargester NSBP010 bypass separator for a maximum drained area of 5,560 m², with 1,000 litres of silt and 150 litres of oil capacity. It proposes modular geocellular soakaway units 1.35 m deep with 95% voids. These are source design statements rather than a purchase or installed specification.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: records an identifiable drainage product and dimension with an explicit historical status.
What is not established
Final product selection, approved substitution, procurement and as-built capacity remain unestablished.
Inspect the evidence
Glendine Way: Engineering Services Design Report · p.19
NSBP010 · Issued 2025-09-10 · Revision 00, P3 Planning; cover says July 2025, control sheet dates planning issue 10 September; received 2025-10-01 · Checked 2026-09-05
NSBP010
A 2.4 m acoustic boundary wall remains subject to location agreement
Council condition; appeal pending · Council boundary-treatment condition; exact construction system not specified
What the evidence says
Condition 6 requires agreement on the exact location and alignment of the proposed 2.4 m acoustic boundary wall before commencement, subject to relevant landowner approvals. It also addresses a new back-garden boundary treatment where agreement is reached to set back to the road reserve.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: identifies an acoustic boundary package with a remaining alignment constraint.
What is not established
Agreed alignment, structural design, material, supplier and constructed wall were not established.
Inspect the evidence
Glendine Way: council decision and 25 conditions · p.5
2.4m high acoustic boundary wall · Issued 2026-07-31 · Council decision; April and July 2026 amendments incorporated · Checked 2026-09-05
2.4m high acoustic boundary wall
Selected pages of 2 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. The exact council index lists 139 document rows. Only cited pages of 2 selected government-published PDFs establish these findings; the remaining catalogue has not been reviewed. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.