The actual order refuses permission
Council refusal under appeal; proposed works not established as authorised · Roscommon 2660258; three separately described commercial spaces
What the evidence says
The 17 July 2026 notification refuses permission for a 2,358 m² foodstore, a separate 145.8 m² café/restaurant and a 145.4 m² retail unit. The signed chief executive order agrees, although its catalogue filename includes “Grant”. Commission case 501861 records the subsequent appeal. This is a refused proposal under appeal, not a granted retail development.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: uses the actual decision rather than a misleading document-index label.
What is not established
The appeal outcome, final permitted design and commencement are unverified.
Inspect the evidence
Monksland foodstore: notification of refusal · p.1
decided to REFUSE TO GRANT PERMISSION · Issued 2026-07-17 · Two refusal reasons; signed CEO pages 3–4 independently corroborate refusal despite misleading catalogue label · Checked 2026-09-06
decided to REFUSE TO GRANT PERMISSION