Save to pipeline

Commercial new build · Co. Roscommon

L-7596-0 Monksland, Athlone, County Roscommon.

Refused 17 Jul 2026

Archived record

This application has left our current planning lists, so this page is no longer updated. We last saw it in the council's register on 16 Aug 2026. The details below are as they were then. The council's register has the current status.

What and where

Development

Permission for development at a site of 1.2106ha on lands to the south of T junction on the R362 and immediately south of the Joe Duffy car showroom, L-7596-0, Monksland, Athlone, County Roscommon. The development will consist of the construction of a single storey discount foodstore (with an ancillary off-licence sales area) with a gross floor area of 2,358m²; (unit 1) a café/restaurant of 145.8m² (with a sheltered outdoor seating area) and (unit 2) a retail unit of 145.4m². The development includes plaza areas between the discount foodstore and café/restaurant unit and fronting onto the road. The site will be serviced by a new vehicle access towards the south of the site; with land set aside to access lands to the east of the site. The provision of surface level car parking spaces (including electrical vehicle charging spaces and the prewiring of other spaces to accommodate future EV parking), a setdown area for taxis, cycle stands, trolley bay, hard and soft landscaping, ESB substation building, site lighting, external mechanical plant area, external bin compound area, roof mounted photo voltaic panels, advertising signage (including designated signage areas on units 1 and 2) including two discount foodstore operator “flagpole signs”, retaining walls and all associated site works. The development also includes the provision of a footpath and cycle path along the west boundary of the site. The development includes all site engineering works, drainage, water supply and SUDS works and associated works at

Location
Athlone, Co. Roscommon Map
Planning reference
2660258
Agent
Fewer Harrington & Partners

Key facts

Floor area
2,504 m²
Estimated construction value
€3.1m to €5.1mOur estimate from floor area and project type, at January 2026 prices, building works only. Not a stated figure. How we estimate
Project type
Commercial new build
Received
27 May 2026
Refused
17 Jul 2026

Timeline

  1. Application received
  2. Refused

Outlook

What happens next

The application was refused on 17 Jul 2026. Work is not expected unless the decision is overturned on appeal or a new application is granted.

Work packages named so far

  • Roads and site development worksNamed in the application description
  • Services and drainageNamed in the application description

An outlook from the planning record, not a tender or a confirmed start date.

Documents and evidence

Check the record

  • Council planning fileThe application file 2660258 on eplanning.ie: drawings, reports and the decision.Open the council's file

Reviewed build intelligence

What the documents establish

Government document review

Council refusal dated 17 July 2026; subsequent Commission appeal 501861 remains separate. Original May technical reports describe the refused proposal, not authorised or installed works.

3 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-06 · Official file index

The actual order refuses permission

Council refusal under appeal; proposed works not established as authorised · Roscommon 2660258; three separately described commercial spaces

What the evidence says
The 17 July 2026 notification refuses permission for a 2,358 m² foodstore, a separate 145.8 m² café/restaurant and a 145.4 m² retail unit. The signed chief executive order agrees, although its catalogue filename includes “Grant”. Commission case 501861 records the subsequent appeal. This is a refused proposal under appeal, not a granted retail development.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: uses the actual decision rather than a misleading document-index label.

What is not established
The appeal outcome, final permitted design and commencement are unverified.

Inspect the evidence

Monksland foodstore: notification of refusal · p.1
decided to REFUSE TO GRANT PERMISSION · Issued 2026-07-17 · Two refusal reasons; signed CEO pages 3–4 independently corroborate refusal despite misleading catalogue label · Checked 2026-09-06

decided to REFUSE TO GRANT PERMISSION

A modular attenuation system is proposed

Council refusal under appeal; proposed works not established as authorised · Original May 2026 surface-water strategy for the refused scheme

What the evidence says
The May engineering report states approximately 512 m³ of required storage in a modular chamber system within a stone-filled bed. It separately describes about 12 m³ of stone storage, emergency gullies and a Class 1 bypass separator. These are source-stated design components; they are not summed here or treated as installed capacity.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: identifies the civil-engineering package while preserving separate storage components.

What is not established
Complete hydraulic reconciliation, any appeal revision, selected chamber product and installation are unverified.

Inspect the evidence

Monksland foodstore: engineering services report · p.14
approximately 512 m³ · Issued May 2026 (month only) · May 2026 cover; received 27 May; selected narrative sections, not all calculation appendices · Checked 2026-09-06

approximately 512 m³

Permeable paving connects to a controlled outfall

Council refusal under appeal; proposed works not established as authorised · May report sections 4.2.3–4.2.4; paving, attenuation and outfall interface

What the evidence says
The report proposes a 200 mm stone sub-base with 30% voids beneath permeable paving, connected through 150 mm perforated pipes. It limits infiltration to the attenuation tank and proposes a Hydrobrake control upstream of the existing local network, at a stated Qbar of 2.0 L/s. This is the proposed drainage arrangement, not demonstrated discharge performance.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: connects the paving specification to its actual drainage destination.

What is not established
Final acceptance, installed control model and measured performance are unverified.

Inspect the evidence

Monksland foodstore: engineering services report · p.15
Qbar is 2.0 L/s · Issued May 2026 (month only) · May 2026 cover; received 27 May; selected narrative sections, not all calculation appendices · Checked 2026-09-06

Qbar is 2.0 L/s

Monksland foodstore: engineering services report · p.13
Permeable paving · Issued May 2026 (month only) · May 2026 cover; received 27 May; selected narrative sections, not all calculation appendices · Checked 2026-09-06

Permeable paving

The model uses 22 Durostar and two Chi fittings

Council refusal under appeal; proposed works not established as authorised · May 2026 modelled external lighting parts list

What the evidence says
The lighting report lists 22 Veelite Durostar fittings at 50 W and two Veelite Chi fittings at a stated 51.5 W. Those quantities belong to the modelled external lighting scheme. They identify proposed equipment families, not a purchase, installation or independently approved lighting schedule.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: retains useful named lighting equipment with the correct design-stage qualification.

What is not established
The final product selection, any appeal revision, installed quantity and commissioning are unverified.

Inspect the evidence

Monksland foodstore: lighting impact assessment · p.10
22 Pieces · Issued 2026-05-21 · Cover dated 21 May; revision 01 table dated 19 May; received 27 May; Durostar temperature fields conflict · Checked 2026-09-06

22 Pieces

The Durostar colour temperature is unresolved

Council refusal under appeal; proposed works not established as authorised · Conflicting fields in the same Durostar parts-list row

What the evidence says
The same Durostar row labels the product “4K” but identifies its fitting as LED 2700K. The Chi row also states 2700K. The Durostar colour temperature is therefore held as a source conflict; neither value is presented as the final installed specification.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: prevents an apparently precise product label from becoming an unsupported final specification.

What is not established
A corrected schedule or final approved colour-temperature selection has not been established.

Inspect the evidence

Monksland foodstore: lighting impact assessment · p.10
Fitting: 1 x LED 2700K Ra70 · Issued 2026-05-21 · Cover dated 21 May; revision 01 table dated 19 May; received 27 May; Durostar temperature fields conflict · Checked 2026-09-06

Fitting: 1 x LED 2700K Ra70
Remaining document questions
  • Which later official decision, approved detail or revision changes these source-specific findings?
  • Has a phase-specific official record established the selected equipment or installed specification?

Selected pages of 3 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. 117 index rows retained; four PDFs accessed. Selected pages of the three supporting PDFs and the corroborating CEO were visually inspected. The CEO is retained corroboration, not an additional supporting PDF in the public bundle. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.

How we know this

From the Roscommon County Council planning register, as last seen on 16 Aug 2026. The council's own file is the official record. Facts from the planning documents were read from the documents in that file.

Explore the area

More planning activity near Athlone

Get alerts for AthloneFree. We email you when new applications appear.

Free email alerts

Get new Athlone projects by email

New planning applications, decisions and site starts in Athlone, Co. Roscommon. We only email when something new appears.

How often

We send a confirmation link first. No alerts until you click it.

Follow this applicationMore alert options