Connected planning records

Appeal/FI, Knockmitten House, Knockmitten Lane, Western Industrial Estate, Dublin 12 - Planning Application SD25A/0212W

South Dublin County Council · SD25A0212W · Dublin

Latest linked evidence

Planning decision · 2026-08-10

SD25A0212W · Permission refused

Open official source

Indexed observation: Refuse Permission. Read the linked decisions for their full terms.

This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.

Source history

Timeline

  1. Planning application received

    SD25A0212W

    Official source

  2. Planning decision

    SD25A0212W

    Permission refused

    Official source

What this record establishes

Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.

Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.

Complete formal refusal grounds · 1 grounds · 2026-08-10

The council’s formal grounds for this decision. Planner assessment and later appeal outcomes are separate.

  1. The subject proposal, by reason of overall layout and facilities proposed (including, inter alia, quantum of triple occupancy rooms, number of sanitary facilities, access to sanitary facilities from bedroom areas, a single kitchen/dining area to serve the entire development) would not provide for adequate levels of privacy or general amenity for future occupants. In addition, while the proposal as indicated would provide for “managed short-stay hostel-style accommodation”, the duration of stay of any persons accommodated within same could not be practically limited or enforced by way of a condition on a grant of permission, even if temporary in nature. Having regard to same, the Planning Authority is not satisfied that the development would provide an acceptable standard of accommodation as proposed and, if permitted, would set an undesirable precedent for similar development which would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area and thus cannot be favourably considered by the Planning Authority.

    Official final decision · PDF page 1, 2

PDF pages visually checked. Document SHA-256: bf65c6af7a5e82d2fcff0e58a326e05d38cc498770e901b4c3486d2076ae4fc9