South Dublin County Council · SD25A0308W
Latest linked evidence
SD25A0308W
Open official sourceThis page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Reviewed build intelligence
Government document review
The July clarification leaves scale, drainage, ecology and acoustic design unresolved. An August notification repeats that request; it grants or refuses neither the original nor a revised scheme.
3 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-07 · Official file index
Clarification request; outcome unverified
What the evidence says
The July clarification asks the applicant to give serious consideration to omitting Tennis Hall 2 and Padel Courts 2 and 3, alongside a revised layout and ecological work. The August notification repeats the clarification decision. The requested reductions are not treated as an adopted revised scheme or a refusal.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Building and sports-surface suppliers need the next accepted layout before relying on original court quantities.
What is not established
A further response, formal deadline extension, withdrawal, refusal, final grant or start is unverified.
Request for clarification of additional information · p.1
omission of Tennis Hall 2 · Issued 2026-07-17 · Order 0807 dated 16 July; letter issued 17 July · Checked 2026-09-07
omission of Tennis Hall 2
August notification of July clarification · p.1
Seek Clarification of Additional Information · Issued 2026-08-13 · Selected first letter only; same order 0807 of 16 July · Checked 2026-09-07
Seek Clarification of Additional Information
Council-required drainage clarification
What the evidence says
The clarification requires revised attenuation drawings and calculations, stating that the proposed 424 m³ is considered undersized and that attenuation should use SuDS rather than underground tanks. It requires buildings to avoid 3 m on either side of the existing surface-water sewer and flags a 450 mm foul sewer beneath a proposed building for consultation with Uisce Éireann.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Civil designers face both capacity and building-layout constraints; submitted storage is not an accepted specification.
What is not established
Revised accepted capacity, sewer-diversion agreement, final layout and installed system are unverified.
Request for clarification of additional information · p.3
surface water attenuation · Issued 2026-07-17 · Order 0807 dated 16 July; letter issued 17 July · Checked 2026-09-07
surface water attenuation
Consultant model challenged by council clarification
What the evidence says
The June Rev C noise report models a nominal acoustic curtain at around 12 dB performance, covering the roof and upper sides with a full-height southern screen. The July request says product acoustic certification is missing and asks for clarification of modelling, berm effects and court-construction assumptions. The 12 dB figure is a model input, not verified product performance.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Acoustic suppliers need tested performance and coordinated court/screen details before pricing an accepted mitigation design.
What is not established
Selected curtain, laboratory certificate, accepted noise assessment and installed attenuation are unverified.
Noise impact assessment revision C · p.21
nominal acoustic curtain · Issued 2026-06-18 · ES Acoustics 22349.NIA-RPT.01 Rev C; received 19 June · Checked 2026-09-07
nominal acoustic curtain
Request for clarification of additional information · p.4
acoustic certification · Issued 2026-07-17 · Order 0807 dated 16 July; letter issued 17 July · Checked 2026-09-07
acoustic certification
The declared pages of these government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Other catalogue files, later compliance, procurement and installed specifications were not established. Historical weekly membership is retained separately from these document dates.
Source history
SD25A0308W
SD25A0308W
Evidence
Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.