Wicklow County Council · 2560942
Latest linked evidence
501974
Open official sourceThis page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Reviewed build intelligence
Government document review
The July 2026 council assessment reduced the original 54-home description to a 52-home proposal. Permission was refused on 29 July 2026 and Commission case 501974 is pending. The accepted olive green detail does not approve the wider scheme; original technical proposals remain source-specific and require checking against the later revision.
6 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-05 · Official file index
Revised proposal; council refusal under appeal · Further-information revision of Wicklow 2560942; 52 proposed homes, not approved or commenced units
What the evidence says
The July 2026 planner assessment records a reduction from 54 to 52 homes after further information. The executive order dated 29 July 2026 refused permission. Commission case 501974 is pending. The original 54-unit description still appears in the order heading and register, so it must not replace the explicitly revised scope.
Further-information revision of Wicklow 2560942; 52 proposed homes, not approved or commenced units
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: gives a reader the material revision and consent state instead of repeating the older headline quantity.
What is not established
No final Commission decision, commencement, approved unit count or installed work is established.
Planner assessment of further information · p.4
from 54 to 52 · Issued 2026-07-23 · Report signed and agreed 23 July 2026; refusal endorsement 29 July 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
from 54 to 52
Executive order refusing permission · p.2
PERMISSION REFUSED · Issued 2026-07-29 · Order CE/PERD/2026/902; dated 29 July 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
PERMISSION REFUSED
Revised proposal; council refusal under appeal · Further-information response to Item 2(d); Building Two elements only
What the evidence says
The council assessment records replacement of the red finish to Building Two guttering, window frames and louvre panelling with an olive green palette. The planner accepted that revised detail, while recommending refusal of the overall development. Acceptance of this detail is not a grant of planning permission.
Further-information response to Item 2(d); Building Two elements only
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for facade and window trades: identifies an explicit finish revision and prevents an earlier colour description from being treated as the current proposal.
What is not established
No coating product, colour code, quantities, procurement or installed finish is established.
Planner assessment of further information · p.7
olive green palette · Issued 2026-07-23 · Report signed and agreed 23 July 2026; refusal endorsement 29 July 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
olive green palette
Original proposal before further information · Original 54-unit application report, before the July 2026 revision to 52 homes
What the evidence says
The November 2025 lifecycle report proposes an in-situ reinforced-concrete frame, facing brickwork, PVC or aluminium-clad windows, and reinforced-concrete balconies/access decks with galvanised metal balustrades. It describes integrated waterproofing, natural or synthetic slate roof tiles, and a green roof terrace with timber or composite decking. These are original report proposals with material alternatives, not a current approved schedule.
Original 54-unit application report, before the July 2026 revision to 52 homes
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for structural, waterproofing and envelope trades: identifies specified work families while keeping alternatives and revision scope visible.
What is not established
No final selection among the alternatives, quantities, structural design, supplier or installed specification is established.
Riverside Works building lifecycle and operational management report · p.12
in-situ reinforced concrete frame · Issued November 2025 (month only) · Original application; received 19 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
in-situ reinforced concrete frame
Conflicting specifications in one report · Conflicting descriptions within the original November 2025 lifecycle report
What the evidence says
The lifecycle report first says individual air-to-water heat pumps will provide heating and hot water. Its later energy section instead proposes or considers exhaust-air heat pumps for all apartments and discusses air-source alternatives. These different statements do not establish a selected heating system.
Conflicting descriptions within the original November 2025 lifecycle report
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for building-services work: the heating and ventilation interface needs a later coordinated design before equipment can be treated as selected.
What is not established
No manufacturer, model, capacity, unit quantity, final system type or commissioning is established.
Riverside Works building lifecycle and operational management report · p.12
air-to-water heat pump systems · Issued November 2025 (month only) · Original application; received 19 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
air-to-water heat pump systems
Riverside Works building lifecycle and operational management report · p.19
Exhaust Air Heat Pumps · Issued November 2025 (month only) · Original application; received 19 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
Exhaust Air Heat Pumps
Original proposal before further information · Original ground, podium and roof lighting drawings, before the later architectural and landscape revision
What the evidence says
The September 2025 planning drawings show Avolux Quasar Micro pole-mounted lights on the ground-level external road layout; Avolux Koala ST, Cosmos and GEA COB fittings in the podium layout; and Nemesis wall fixtures on the roof terrace. These are source-named planning products across separate drawings. The layout has not been treated as an installed schedule or as a count of luminaires.
Original ground, podium and roof lighting drawings, before the later architectural and landscape revision
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for lighting suppliers: provides concrete named products and their drawing-level scope without assuming purchase or installation.
What is not established
No final lighting revision coordinated with the 52-home layout, contract, installed count or product substitution is established. The repeated Type H caption and Type I legend are retained as a drawing-label inconsistency, not resolved by inference.
Riverside Works lighting: Ground-level external roads · p.3
AVOLUX QUASAR MICRO · Issued 2025-09-02 · Report issue 02, 2 September 2025; drawing P01 September 2025; received 19 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
AVOLUX QUASAR MICRO
Riverside Works lighting: First-floor podium · p.3
AVOLUX KOALA ST · Issued 2025-09-02 · Report issue 02, 2 September 2025; drawing P01 September 2025; received 19 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
AVOLUX KOALA ST
Riverside Works lighting: Roof terrace · p.3
NEMESIS WALL FIXTURE · Issued 2025-09-02 · Report issue 02, 2 September 2025; drawing P01 September 2025; received 19 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
NEMESIS WALL FIXTURE
Selected pages of 6 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. The council index contained 412 parsed document rows. Seven PDFs were accessed; selected pages of six support these findings. The older 43-page planning report was read selectively but is not presented as the latest assessment. The large appeal package and remaining catalogue have not been fully inspected. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.
Source history
2560942
2560942
Permission refused
501974
Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.