Connected planning records

Planning case 260355

Cork County Council · 260355

Latest linked evidence

Planning decision · 2026-04-09

260355 · Permission refused

Open official source

This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.

Source history

Timeline

  1. Planning application received

    260355

    Official source

  2. Planning decision

    260355

    Permission refused

    Official source

What this record establishes

Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.

Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.

Complete formal refusal grounds · 1 grounds · 2026-04-09

The council’s formal grounds for this decision. Planner assessment and later appeal outcomes are separate.

  1. As set out in objective EC 8-15 of the Cork County Development Plan 2022, it is an objective of the Planning Authority to encourage the development of sustainable agriculture and related infrastructure including farm buildings. On the basis of the information submitted and having regard to the siting, nature, size, scale and design of the proposed development and the extent of the subject site, the Planning Authority is not satisfied that the applicant has demonstrated a justification for the proposed development at this location or that it would comply with the stated objective to provide sustainable agricultural development. It is considered that the proposed shed would not be appropriate or compatible with the stated use on this restricted site. The Planning Authority is not satisfied that the proposal would not give rise to negative impacts in terms of amenity. It is considered that the proposed development would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments and it would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

    Official final decision · PDF page 2

PDF pages visually checked. Document SHA-256: 868a8980f3d39fbfb1f0ddcc2539c6832ca513cb22edcd09e000a6f9860949fc