Connected planning records

Planning case SD26A0131W

South Dublin County Council · SD26A0131W

Latest linked evidence

Further information requested · 2026-07-28

SD26A0131W

Open official source

This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.

Reviewed build intelligence

What the documents establish

Government document review

The signed 28 July 2026 notice requests additional information. It is not a grant or refusal. Proposed designs remain pending that process; no later response, permission or installed work was verified.

3 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-06 · Official file index

Road-safety and aviation evidence is still required

Further information requested; proposal not approved · Information request for SD26A/0131W

What the evidence says
The 28 July notice requires Stage 1 and Stage 2 road-safety audits plus an aviation impact assessment addressing Casement flight procedures, PV panels and communication/navigation/surveillance equipment. Department of Defence agreement is required before the aviation report is submitted to the council. The proposed self-storage building would supersede the previous warehouse permission SD23A/0087; that change is not yet approved.

Why it may matter — interpretation
A design team should resolve the safety and aviation submissions before treating the roof and site proposal as consented.

What is not established
No subsequent response, approval, final grant or start is established.

Inspect the evidence

Request for Additional Information · p.1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION · Issued 2026-07-28 · Order 0857 requests additional information; catalogue label Notification of Decision must not be treated as permission · Checked 2026-09-06

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Request for Additional Information · p.2
Department of Defence · Issued 2026-07-28 · Order 0857 requests additional information; catalogue label Notification of Decision must not be treated as permission · Checked 2026-09-06

Department of Defence

Blue-roof storage is separate from the detention basin

Application proposal; permission, procurement and installation unverified · Proposed roof and ground drainage systems

What the evidence says
PL4 proposes 810 m² of blue-roof attenuation using Bauder or similar approved, with 100 mm maximum water level. It separately shows a 145 m³ detention basin and an outlet control of 0.7 l/s. These are separate roof and ground systems; their areas and volumes are not added into one capacity.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Roofing and civil suppliers should coordinate their separate storage and discharge interfaces before pricing.

What is not established
Final design, approval and installation remain unverified.

Inspect the evidence

Drainage and Watermain Layout · p.1
BAUDER OR SIMILAR APPROVED · Issued 2026-05-21 · PL4 issued for planning 21 May 2026, received 3 June; title block also statesMay 2026 · Checked 2026-09-06

BAUDER OR SIMILAR APPROVED

The drainage drawing permits equivalent treatment products

Application proposal; permission, procurement and installation unverified · Proposed surface-water treatment at the self-storage site

What the evidence says
The drawing identifies a SurfSep SWI0604 silt trap and Klargester Class 1 bypass petrol interceptor NSBP004, each allowing similar approved alternatives. They remain proposed drainage components rather than selected purchased products.

Why it may matter — interpretation
An interceptor supplier should confirm the accepted equivalent and hydraulic duty before offering equipment.

What is not established
The final approved model, supplier and installed system are unknown.

Inspect the evidence

Drainage and Watermain Layout · p.1
NSBP004 OR SIMILAR APPROVED · Issued 2026-05-21 · PL4 issued for planning 21 May 2026, received 3 June; title block also statesMay 2026 · Checked 2026-09-06

NSBP004 OR SIMILAR APPROVED

The lighting calculation names two CU Phosco families

Application proposal; permission, procurement and installation unverified · Six modelled lighting points in the May application design

What the evidence says
The 29 May calculation uses three CU Phosco P852K (39 W) fittings and three E950 (5 W) fittings, at modelled mounting heights of 8 m and 6 m respectively. These are calculation inputs for this application, not evidence of an awarded lighting package.

Why it may matter — interpretation
A lighting supplier should check the final optics and mounting arrangements after the outstanding application reviews.

What is not established
Final adopted schedule, award and installation are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Public Lighting Report · p.2
C U Phosco · Issued 2026-05-29 · Public lighting calculation 29 May 2026, received 3 June; catalogue upload 4 June · Checked 2026-09-06

C U Phosco
Remaining document questions
  • Which later official decision, approved detail or revision changes these source-specific findings?
  • Has a phase-specific official record established the selected equipment or installed specification?

Selected pages of 3 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Only the named supporting PDFs and declared pages were inspected for these findings; remaining catalogue entries and later compliance are not reviewed. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.

Source history

Timeline

  1. Planning application received

    SD26A0131W

    Official source

  2. Further information requested

    SD26A0131W

    Official source

What this record establishes

Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.

Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.