Louth County Council · 2660055
Latest linked evidence
2660055 · Conditional permission
This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Reviewed build intelligence
Government document review
W32 appeal324546 concerns Louth2660055. The official February2026 NIS distinguishes48 permitted duplexes from40 replacement houses and changes the overall scheme from272 to264 dwellings. The appeal remains pending.
1 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-05 · Official file index
Proposed amendment; outcome pending · Amendment within Bridgegate SHD; only40 replacement houses in this comparison
What the evidence says
The NIS comparison tables show48 duplexes replaced by40 houses:6 Type1,24 Type2 and10 Type3. The overall scheme changes from272 to264 units.
Amendment within Bridgegate SHD; only40 replacement houses in this comparison Internal page9 mix discrepancy retained; page10 explicit tables used
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for planners and estimators: separate the replacement package from the whole-scheme total to avoid materially overstating new work.
What is not established
The current Commission summary is compressed and page9 bedroom-mix prose conflicts with the tables. Verify final approved drawings and appeal outcome; no new permission or procurement conclusion is inferred.
Bridgegate Natura Impact Statement · p.10
Inspected PDF page 10 · Issued 2026-02-03 · 2602-NIS-F-2026.02.03; stamped received6February2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
Units subject to amendment 40
Proposed amendment; outcome pending · Amended Bridgegate area, not the earlier whole-site Stormtech arrangement
What the evidence says
The proposed amended area uses permeable paving and attenuation, with petrol interceptors and maximum discharge rates of1.4L/s north and2.0L/s south. The report directs the reader to drawingA112-CSC-XX-XX-DR-C-0201.
Amended Bridgegate area, not the earlier whole-site Stormtech arrangement Outfall description inconsistency and old-versus-amended storage scope retained
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for drainage designers and contractors: the amendment changes the relevant catchment interfaces and flow-control requirements.
What is not established
Page12 contains different descriptions of the outfalls and separately states older storage requirements. Confirm the cited drawing and final discharge agreement before selecting tanks or claiming capacities.
Bridgegate Natura Impact Statement · p.12
Inspected PDF page 12 · Issued 2026-02-03 · 2602-NIS-F-2026.02.03; stamped received6February2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
1.4L/s for the north catchment and 2.0L/s
One47-page NIS linked by ACP; selected scope and drainage pages inspected. Council decision, amended engineering drawing and later compliance not inspected. The prose on page9 inconsistently lists6+36 houses, while page10 tables total40; preserve this conflict rather than repeat42.
Source history
2660055
2660055
Conditional permission
Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.