Connected planning records

Temporary/event, Dromclogher, Cappamore, Co. Limerick. - Planning Application 25391

Limerick City and County Council · 25391 · Limerick

Latest linked evidence

Planning decision · 2026-08-13

25391 · Conditional permission

Open official source

Indexed observation: Granted. Read the linked decisions for their full terms.

This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.

Reviewed build intelligence

What the documents establish

Government document review

The 13 August notification is a decision to grant, explicitly not final permission. New warehouse and depot works are distinct from existing works sought for retention. The December site drawing is historical and subject to July FI and the decision conditions.

2 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-07 · Official file index

Decision covers new warehouse works and a separate retention scope

Decision to grant new and retained works; final grant not established

What the evidence says
The August notice describes a new 10,000 m² warehouse, administration and truck facilities, drainage infrastructure and two firefighting water-storage tanks. It separately describes retention of existing wash-bay, temporary office, septic, shed, tank and yard works. The decision expressly says it is not a grant of permission and that work must not start before permission is granted.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Warehouse, yard and service suppliers should separate proposed construction from existing facilities and qualify mobilisation against final permission.

What is not established
Final grant, commencement and a reconciled inventory of new versus retained equipment are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Decision notification and 15 conditions · p.1
Decision to grant; new warehouse and separate retention; notice is not permission · Issued 2026-08-13 · Signed 13 August; incorporates FI received 17 July; notice is not final permission · Checked 2026-09-07

Decision to grant; new warehouse and separate retention; notice is not permission

Original proposed site layout · p.1
24-069-02 revision A: original warehouse, depot and tank layout · Issued December 2025 (month only) · 24-069-02 revision A, December 2025 revision to November base; received 10 December; predates July FI · Checked 2026-09-07

24-069-02 revision A: original warehouse, depot and tank layout

R505 resurfacing is required before other site works

Council conditions on access works and road safety

What the evidence says
Condition 4 requires full-carriageway resurfacing for 20 m in each direction at the main entrance and at the second garage/store, fuel and tyre-shed entrance before any other site works. It requires agreed road details and a Road Opening Licence. The decision also calls for a Stage 3 road-safety audit.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Civil and haulage teams need the highway agreement and early resurfacing sequence in the mobilisation plan.

What is not established
Accepted road details, Road Opening Licence, completed resurfacing and accepted road-safety audit are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Decision notification and 15 conditions · p.4
Condition 4: R505 resurfacing before other site works · Issued 2026-08-13 · Signed 13 August; incorporates FI received 17 July; notice is not final permission · Checked 2026-09-07

Condition 4: R505 resurfacing before other site works

Decision notification and 15 conditions · p.5
Condition 6: Stage 3 road-safety audit · Issued 2026-08-13 · Signed 13 August; incorporates FI received 17 July; notice is not final permission · Checked 2026-09-07

Condition 6: Stage 3 road-safety audit

Drainage requires further redesign despite the submitted biodiversity system

Original drawing provides historical context; the August conditions govern further design

What the evidence says
The original site drawing places a surface-water biodiversity area beside the R505. Condition 8 requires the basins to be relocated sufficiently from the road and requires revised levels, sections and connections. It specifies a full-retention interceptor, treatment through the biodiversity area and a controlled outfall to the existing open drain. Revised calculations must include 30% climate-change and 10% urban-creep allowances.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Civil, drainage and landscape suppliers need a coordinated revised system rather than assume the original basin location and calculations are accepted.

What is not established
Accepted revised basin location, hydraulic calculations, interceptor and flow-control specifications and outfall details are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Original proposed site layout · p.1
Original revision A site layout: biodiversity drainage area beside R505 · Issued December 2025 (month only) · 24-069-02 revision A, December 2025 revision to November base; received 10 December; predates July FI · Checked 2026-09-07

Original revision A site layout: biodiversity drainage area beside R505

Decision notification and 15 conditions · p.5
Condition 8(a): relocate basins and provide revised drainage layout · Issued 2026-08-13 · Signed 13 August; incorporates FI received 17 July; notice is not final permission · Checked 2026-09-07

Condition 8(a): relocate basins and provide revised drainage layout

Decision notification and 15 conditions · p.6
Condition 8: treatment train, calculations and climate/urban-creep allowances · Issued 2026-08-13 · Signed 13 August; incorporates FI received 17 July; notice is not final permission · Checked 2026-09-07

Condition 8: treatment train, calculations and climate/urban-creep allowances

Drainage audits and certification control commencement and occupation

Drainage design and phased handover conditions

What the evidence says
Condition 8 requires a Stage 1 storm-water audit, a Stage 2 detailed-design audit and an agreed maintenance plan before commencement. Each phase needs completion certification and a Stage 3 storm-water audit before occupation. These conditions remain requirements rather than evidence that the design or works have been accepted.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Designers, contractors and operators need independent review and certification included in the programme and drainage handover scope.

What is not established
Accepted audits, maintenance agreement, as-built certification and completed drainage works are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Decision notification and 15 conditions · p.6
Condition 8(a): Stage 1 storm-water audit · Issued 2026-08-13 · Signed 13 August; incorporates FI received 17 July; notice is not final permission · Checked 2026-09-07

Condition 8(a): Stage 1 storm-water audit

Decision notification and 15 conditions · p.7
Condition 8(b-h): maintenance, Stage 2 and Stage 3 audits and phase certification · Issued 2026-08-13 · Signed 13 August; incorporates FI received 17 July; notice is not final permission · Checked 2026-09-07

Condition 8(b-h): maintenance, Stage 2 and Stage 3 audits and phase certification
Remaining document questions
  • Has final permission issued, and have the revised drainage, road works and independent audits been agreed?

The declared pages of these government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Other catalogue files, later compliance, procurement and installed specifications were not established. Historical weekly membership is retained separately from these document dates.

Source history

Timeline

  1. Planning application received

    25391

    Official source

  2. Planning decision

    25391

    Conditional permission

    Official source

What this record establishes

Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.

Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.