Connected planning records

Appeal/FI, Coolgreany Demense, Coolgreany - Planning Application 20260797

Wexford County Council · 20260797 · Wexford

Latest linked evidence

Planning decision · 2026-08-12

20260797 · Permission refused

Open official source

Indexed observation: Refused. Read the linked decisions for their full terms.

This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.

Source history

Timeline

  1. Planning application received

    20260797

    Official source

  2. Planning decision

    20260797

    Permission refused

    Official source

What this record establishes

Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.

Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.

Complete formal refusal grounds · 3 grounds · 2026-08-12

The council’s formal grounds for this decision. Planner assessment and later appeal outcomes are separate.

  1. The proposed development to be retained, by reason of its proximity to the adjoining watercourse would give rise to an unacceptable risk of adverse impacts to a watercourse, including sedimentation, potential pollution and deterioration in water quality. The proposal would therefore be contrary to Objective FRM18 and Objective WQ15 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028, Volume One and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

    Official final decision · PDF page 2
  2. The proposed development to be retained would result in the intensification of an existing access where limited sightlines are available. Having regard to the increased frequency of vehicular movements associated with the proposed development to be retained and the restricted visibility at this location, the development would give rise to a traffic hazard and endanger public safety. The development proposed to be retained would therefore be contrary to Objective TS78 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028, Volume One and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

    Official final decision · PDF page 2
  3. The applicant has failed to submit an adequate Flood Risk Assessment to demonstrate that the proposed development to be retained would not be at risk of flooding, would not increase the risk of flooding elsewhere and would not adversely affect the flow of the adjoining watercourse. In the absence of such information, the Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that the proposal would not give rise to unacceptable risks to public safety. The proposal in its current form is therefore contrary to Objective FRM07 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028, Volume One and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

    Official final decision · PDF page 2

PDF pages visually checked. Document SHA-256: d4644856e80aaec66589b50f92c076a66130bdcd73b3bb2a47084b0d40311504