The council decided to grant 109 homes (65 houses and 44 duplex apartments) and a creche on 23 July 2026 with 56 conditions. Commission appeal 324586 is pending. Application design options, later consultant review and council conditions are distinct evidence stages; no final grant or installed specification is established.
Heat-pump selection is inconsistent within the energy report
Source details need reconciliation · Internal conflict within the July 2025 Revision 0.0 energy statement
What the evidence says
The July 2025 energy statement retains gas boilers with solar panels and air-source heat pumps as options on PDF page 13. Page 19 repeats alternatives, then says there will be no gas connection and that heating and hot water will use heat pumps exclusively. The report therefore does not consistently establish the selected heating strategy.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: identifies the services decision that needs clarification before a product or utility package can be treated as selected.
What is not established
No later signed heating schedule, capacity, manufacturer, refrigerant, gas connection or installed system was verified.
Inspect the evidence
Lisdaran LRD: Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Adaptation Design Statement · p.13
Option 1 - Gas Fired Boilers with Solar Panels. · Issued July 2025 (month only) · Revision 0.0; received 13 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
Option 1 - Gas Fired Boilers with Solar Panels.
Lisdaran LRD: Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Adaptation Design Statement · p.19
exclusively utilize heat pumps · Issued July 2025 (month only) · Revision 0.0; received 13 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
exclusively utilize heat pumps
Calculation list contains 97 proposed Phosco fittings
Source details need reconciliation · Pre-curfew calculation parts list in the draft R03 lighting report, 17 October 2025
What the evidence says
The October 2025 pre-curfew calculation parts list contains 25 Phosco P852K fittings at 24 W, 7 at 28 W and 65 at 38 W: 97 modelled fittings. Those entries use the 730 model variants. Separate specification tables on PDF pages 6 and 7 contain 740 variants for two types, so the final model codes are not treated as settled.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: provides a source-scoped lighting quantity and product family, while exposing the inconsistent variant codes.
What is not established
These are modelled fittings, not installed quantities or an awarded supply order. A reconciled current schedule and final approved product variant remain unconfirmed.
Inspect the evidence
Lisdaran: Site Lighting Report · p.6
TYPE PL2 · Issued 2025-10-17 · Draft issue R03; received 13 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
TYPE PL2
Lisdaran: Site Lighting Report · p.7
TYPE PL3 · Issued 2025-10-17 · Draft issue R03; received 13 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
TYPE PL3
Lisdaran: Site Lighting Report · p.13
Luminaire parts list · Issued 2025-10-17 · Draft issue R03; received 13 November 2025 · Checked 2026-09-05
Luminaire parts list
Later ecology memo supports the R03 lighting design
Consultant recommendation · Ecology review dated 28 May 2026 and received 30 May 2026
What the evidence says
The 28 May 2026 ecology memorandum says it reviewed the R03 lighting report and recommends approval of the lighting plan on nocturnal-species grounds, subject to correct implementation. This is a consultant recommendation submitted in further information, not itself the council approval or a product order.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: connects the original lighting design to the later further-information review without upgrading the reviewer recommendation into final approval.
What is not established
A full later approved lighting schedule, installation certification and reconciliation of the report model-code differences were not inspected.
Inspect the evidence
Lisdaran: memorandum reviewing the lighting plan · p.1
our recommendation · Issued 2026-05-28 · Further-information ecology review; received 30 May 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
our recommendation
Council required 10% functioning EV charging
Council decision under appeal · Condition 40 in the council decision to grant, under appeal 324586
What the evidence says
Condition 40 of the 23 July 2026 council decision requires functioning EV charge points at a minimum of 10% of all car parking spaces, with ducting for the remaining spaces. Any outstanding proposals must be agreed in writing before occupation.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: distinguishes working charge-point provision from parking prepared for future charging.
What is not established
Charger numbers, power ratings, selected manufacturer, appointed operator and completed works are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Cavan 25/60670: notification of decision to grant · p.10
A minimum of 10% · Issued 2026-07-23 · Council decision with 56 conditions; appeal 324586 remains pending · Checked 2026-09-05
A minimum of 10%
Council rejected two submitted boundary treatments
Council decision under appeal · Condition 8 in the council decision to grant, under appeal 324586
What the evidence says
Condition 8 does not permit Boundary Treatment Type 6 or the submitted treatment beside the creche. It requires alternative details to be agreed in writing before development begins.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: records a specific later design change affecting boundary works rather than presenting every submitted detail as accepted.
What is not established
The rejected drawing materials and the eventual replacement detail were not inspected. No constructed fence or wall is established.
Inspect the evidence
Cavan 25/60670: notification of decision to grant · p.5
Boundary Treatment Type 6 · Issued 2026-07-23 · Council decision with 56 conditions; appeal 324586 remains pending · Checked 2026-09-05
Boundary Treatment Type 6
Selected pages of 4 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Four government-published PDFs were inspected on selected pages, not all 250 registry rows. No complete engineering or condition-discharge review was performed. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.