Wexford County Council · 20260804 · Wexford
Latest linked evidence
20260804 · Permission refused
Open official sourceIndexed observation: Refused. Read the linked decisions for their full terms.
This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Source history
20260804
20260804
Permission refused
Evidence
Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.
The council’s formal grounds for this decision. Planner assessment and later appeal outcomes are separate.
The proposed development would materially intensify traffic movements to/from the overall site which has undefined access/egress arrangements to/from the Class 1 regional road R733, where the maximum speed limit applies. Furthermore, the proposed access point to the R733 is located outside of the application site and insufficient information has been submitted on: - likely traffic movements and a Road Safety Audit; - the provision of 220m sightlines in both directions; - clear demarcation of existing parking and manoeuvring areas; - the provision of suitable surface to the access and car park. As such the proposed development would endanger public safety by reason of traffic hazards and would be contrary to Section 8.7.1.2 and Objectives TS73 and TS75 of Volume 1 and Section 6.2.6 of Volume 2 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028 and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official final decision · PDF page 2Insufficient information has been submitted on how surface water would be effectively managed at the site to prevent ponding on the site and/or discharges to the public road or adjoining property. As such the proposed development would be contrary to Objective SWM01 of Volume 1 and Section 6.2.6 of Volume 2 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028 and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official final decision · PDF page 2It has not been demonstrated that the proposed development would not have an adverse impact on the Slaney River Valley SAC or the Wexford Harbour and Slobs SPA.
Official final decision · PDF page 2A Site Specific Flood Risk Assessment has not been submitted. As such it has not been demonstrated that flood risks would not be generated. As such the proposed development would be contrary to Objective FRM01 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022 - 2028 and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official final decision · PDF page 2The provision of charging points serving one single car manufacturer would set a dangerous precedent for the proliferation of electrical charging points throughout the County. The proposed development would set a precedent for the numerous electrical car makers to build exclusive use charging points and would therefore be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official final decision · PDF page 2PDF pages visually checked. Document SHA-256: ad3e95f77978418b8ec48b1aad38154ee77b23b718936d00dd65fab8b5740101