The 31 July decision concerns a 459 m² extension to a 2,522 m² building. Final cladding and signage need agreement. The notice expressly says it is not the grant of permission.
459 m² is added storage, not the whole building
Extension scope under a decision to grant
What the evidence says
The drawing and report distinguish 2,522 m² existing floor area from 459 m² new storage, giving 2,981 m² overall. The 31 July notice is a decision to grant and expressly says development is not authorised until the grant issues.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Estimators can separate new storage work from existing premises; total building area is not all new construction.
What is not established
Final grant, commencement and construction contract were not established. No retained headline is overwritten.
Inspect the evidence
Proposed plans elevations sections and visualisations · p.1
FLOOR AREA schedule · Issued 2026-05-12 · 3187 PS GA01/02/04/04/06/07 as printed; column EG; Design Stage Only; received 9 June · Checked 2026-09-07
FLOOR AREA schedule
Signed planner assessment · p.1
existing 2522 m²; proposed 459 m² · Issued 2026-07-15 · Signed 15 July; published with July decision · Checked 2026-09-07
existing 2522 m²; proposed 459 m²
Notification of decision to grant · p.1
NOT the grant of permission · Issued 2026-07-31 · PL.26.0645; expressly not a grant · Checked 2026-09-07
NOT the grant of permission
The roof-height description needs reconciliation
May drawings and July report differ on the roof relationship
What the evidence says
Submitted elevations and section show new cladding, high-level windows and the Monivea Road frontage. The section labels 7.10 m for the extension and 6.90 m for the existing building, while the planner report describes adherence to the existing ridge height. Both descriptions are retained; no height is silently selected as agreed.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Facade and structural teams should confirm the agreed section before fixing connection and cladding geometry.
What is not established
A later reconciled or construction-issued roof section was not reviewed.
Inspect the evidence
Proposed plans elevations sections and visualisations · p.2
Proposed south elevation · Issued 2026-05-12 · 3187 PS GA01/02/04/04/06/07 as printed; column EG; Design Stage Only; received 9 June · Checked 2026-09-07
Proposed south elevation
Proposed plans elevations sections and visualisations · p.4
Section A-A; 7100; 6900 · Issued 2026-05-12 · 3187 PS GA01/02/04/04/06/07 as printed; column EG; Design Stage Only; received 9 June · Checked 2026-09-07
Section A-A; 7100; 6900
Signed planner assessment · p.2
adheres to roof ridge height · Issued 2026-07-15 · Signed 15 July; published with July decision · Checked 2026-09-07
adheres to roof ridge height
Cladding and signage require agreement before commencement
Facade and sign details remain conditional
What the evidence says
Condition 4 requires written agreement of final cladding and signage materials, texture and colour before commencement. Condition 5 prevents additional advertising signs beyond those shown without separate permission. Submitted visualisations do not establish an agreed manufactured finish or lighting.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Sign and facade suppliers need the agreed design before manufacture.
What is not established
Approved material schedule, illumination specification, manufacture and installation were not established.
Inspect the evidence
Notification of decision to grant · p.2
Conditions 4 and 5 · Issued 2026-07-31 · PL.26.0645; expressly not a grant · Checked 2026-09-07
Conditions 4 and 5
Proposed plans elevations sections and visualisations · p.2
Proposed south elevation · Issued 2026-05-12 · 3187 PS GA01/02/04/04/06/07 as printed; column EG; Design Stage Only; received 9 June · Checked 2026-09-07
Proposed south elevation
Proposed plans elevations sections and visualisations · p.6
3D view; Design Stage Only · Issued 2026-05-12 · 3187 PS GA01/02/04/04/06/07 as printed; column EG; Design Stage Only; received 9 June · Checked 2026-09-07
3D view; Design Stage Only
Frontage work must protect utilities and prevent public runoff
Road and service interface in the July decision
What the evidence says
The site plan places the extension beside Monivea Road while retaining industrial-estate access. Conditions 2 and 3 require prior written agreement for public-utility alterations and prohibit surface-water runoff to the public road or footpath.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Civil teams should resolve frontage drainage and service alterations before siteworks.
What is not established
Utility diversion agreement, detailed drainage design and completed frontage work were not reviewed.
Inspect the evidence
Proposed site layout · p.1
Monivea Road; extension; existing access · Issued 2026-05-20 · 3187 PS GA03; column EG; Planning Stage Only; received 9 June · Checked 2026-09-07
Monivea Road; extension; existing access
Notification of decision to grant · p.2
Conditions 2 and 3 · Issued 2026-07-31 · PL.26.0645; expressly not a grant · Checked 2026-09-07
Conditions 2 and 3
The declared pages of these government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Other catalogue files, later compliance, procurement and installed specifications were not established. Historical weekly membership is retained separately from these document dates.