Connected planning records

Planning case F26A0365E

Fingal County Council · F26A0365E

Latest linked evidence

Planning decision · 2026-06-24

F26A0365E · Decision recorded

Open official source

This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.

Source history

Timeline

  1. Planning application received

    F26A0365E

    Official source

  2. Planning decision

    F26A0365E

    Decision recorded

    Official source

What this record establishes

Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.

Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.

Complete formal refusal grounds · 3 grounds · 2026-06-24

The council’s formal grounds for this decision. Planner assessment and later appeal outcomes are separate.

Source note: The report uses earlier references F25A/0767E and F25A/0769E in different sections. Its history lists the treatment-plant requirement under “1)”, while the adopted second ground cites “Condition 3” of F04A/0683. These source expressions are preserved; the original appeal condition has not been renumbered or independently reconciled.

  1. The applicant has failed to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority that the additional wastewater arising from this development may be safely disposed of on site without risk to public health or to the environment. In the absence of such satisfactory details the development as proposed would be contrary to Objective DMSO196 of the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029; prejudicial to public health; and, contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

    Official final decision · PDF page 12
  2. Condition 3 of Reg Ref: F04A/0683 (ABP Ref: PL06F.208096), required the applicant to submit a report, prepared by an independent engineer, regarding the operation of the existing treatment plant and its impact on the surrounding environment. While the applicant had submitted engineer reports, insufficient details were submitted and contradictions were found throughout the application. Therefore the applicant is not considered to have adequately addressed this issue and a grant of permission for the proposed development at this location, in the absence of such matters being resolved, would be prejudicial to public health and contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

    Official final decision · PDF page 12
  3. As a consequence of insufficient information submitted, it cannot be concluded that the proposed development would not cause serious water pollution, and a negative impact on the environment. The absence of evidence that the proposal would not result in a significant impact on the conservation objectives of European sites, precludes the planning authority from permitting the proposal. In addition, the proposed development would be contrary to Objective DMSO1 and DMSO145 of the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029 which seeks to Ensure that sufficient information is provided as part of development proposals to enable Screening for Appropriate Assessment to be undertaken and to enable a fully informed assessment of impacts on biodiversity to be made. The development would, therefore, be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

    Official final decision · PDF page 12

PDF pages visually checked. Document SHA-256: 216423fa1157e8b04c01dee934bdc20f25d726773a3bd543cae3df1b3cd7e750