South Dublin County Council · SD26A0159W · Dublin
Latest linked evidence
SD26A0159W
Open official sourceIndexed observation: Granted. Read the linked decisions for their full terms.
This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Reviewed build intelligence
Government document review
The reviewed July application divides an existing retail unit and adds internal shopfronts and an escape corridor. The retained register records a 20 August grant decision, but its decision PDF and conditions were not present in the reviewed catalogue. These application details do not establish the final approved specification.
4 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-07 · Official file index
Application scope before the retained 20 August grant decision; decision conditions not inspected
What the evidence says
The application starts with a vacant 171.25 m² unit and describes two retail units of approximately 92 m² and 60 m². Drawing 07006 C1 labels their areas 91.85 m² and 59.9 m² within the existing envelope. The planning statement says there is no net gain or loss of retail floorspace. Existing and proposed parts must not be added as new floor area.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Fit-out teams can size the subdivision without treating existing space and its component units as separate new construction.
What is not established
The final approved layout, conditions, commencement and a replacement headline area are not established by these application PDFs.
Council acknowledgement and exact application scope · p.1
Development: existing vacant ... 171.25 ... 92 ... 60 · Issued 2026-07-08 · Acknowledgement dated 8 July; application received 3 July; not a decision · Checked 2026-09-07
Development: existing vacant ... 171.25 ... 92 ... 60
Existing and proposed retail floor plans · p.1
EXISTING 171.25sq.m; PROPOSED 91.85 m² and 59.9 m²; C1 · Issued 2026-07-03 · 1272-MDO-ZZ-00-DR-A-07006 C1; issued for planning 3 July; S5 for submission · Checked 2026-09-07
EXISTING 171.25sq.m; PROPOSED 91.85 m² and 59.9 m²; C1
Planning statement and covering letter · p.4
will not result in a net gain or net loss of retail floorspace · Issued 2026-07-03 · Signed covering statement dated 3 July 2026; received 3 July · Checked 2026-09-07
will not result in a net gain or net loss of retail floorspace
July submitted escape arrangement; later decision conditions remain uninspected
What the evidence says
The July plan introduces a separating wall and rear corridor serving both units. The statement connects this arrangement to the existing fire escape on the shopping centre southern elevation. This is an internal circulation and partitioning proposal.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Partitioning and fire-safety teams need to coordinate both tenant spaces with the shared existing escape route.
What is not established
Building-control approval, fire certificate details, final construction design and installed fire-resisting products were not reviewed.
Existing and proposed retail floor plans · p.1
PROPOSED NEW SEPARATING WALL; rear corridor · Issued 2026-07-03 · 1272-MDO-ZZ-00-DR-A-07006 C1; issued for planning 3 July; S5 for submission · Checked 2026-09-07
PROPOSED NEW SEPARATING WALL; rear corridor
Planning statement and covering letter · p.5
emergency exits / fire escape routes ... southern elevation · Issued 2026-07-03 · Signed covering statement dated 3 July 2026; received 3 July · Checked 2026-09-07
emergency exits / fire escape routes ... southern elevation
July proposed shopfront and unresolved signage details
What the evidence says
Drawing 08001 C1 shows separate glazed shopfront entrances replacing the boarded vacant frontage. The statement says the change is visible inside the mall and does not alter the larger centre external elevations. It supplies no signage details and suggests later agreement by condition; that suggestion is not itself an imposed condition.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Glazing and fit-out suppliers have a defined internal frontage, while signage needs the actual decision and agreed details before manufacture.
What is not established
The grant conditions, approved signage, lighting specification and any later shopfront revision were not reviewed.
Existing and proposed internal elevations and sections · p.1
PROPOSED GLAZED SHOP FRONT WITH DOOR ACCESS; C1 · Issued 2026-07-03 · 1272-MDO-ZZ-XX-DR-A-08001 C1; issued for planning 3 July; S5 for submission · Checked 2026-09-07
PROPOSED GLAZED SHOP FRONT WITH DOOR ACCESS; C1
Planning statement and covering letter · p.4
only be visible from inside the mall · Issued 2026-07-03 · Signed covering statement dated 3 July 2026; received 3 July · Checked 2026-09-07
only be visible from inside the mall
Planning statement and covering letter · p.5
does not include any details of proposed signage · Issued 2026-07-03 · Signed covering statement dated 3 July 2026; received 3 July · Checked 2026-09-07
does not include any details of proposed signage
The declared pages of these government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Other catalogue files, later compliance, procurement and installed specifications were not established. Historical weekly membership is retained separately from these document dates.
Source history
SD26A0159W
SD26A0159W
Permission granted
SD26A0159W
Evidence
Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.