Dublin City Council · WEB125026
Latest linked evidence
501881
Open official sourceThis page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Reviewed build intelligence
Government document review
Council refusal was decided on 17 July and notified on 20 July 2026. Appeal 501881, lodged on 13 August, remains pending. The revised 43-apartment scope is distinct from the original 45 description; January technical specifications have not been reconciled to an approved later design.
5 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-05 · Official file index
Council refusal under appeal · Council refusal for WEB1250/26; appeal status is separately sourced to the exact Commission page
What the evidence says
Dublin City Council refused permission by order dated 17 July 2026; the notification is dated 20 July. The stated reasons concern demolition of the historic Roundtown structures and the proposal’s scale and massing. Commission appeal 501881 was lodged on 13 August and remains listed as pending.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: keeps the decision, notification and appeal stages distinct.
What is not established
The appeal outcome and any approved revised design are not established.
Terenure mixed-use development: refusal notification · p.1
Decision Date 17-Jul-2026 · Issued 2026-07-20 · Notification dated 20 July; decision order dated 17 July 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
Decision Date 17-Jul-2026
Terenure mixed-use development: refusal notification · p.2
NOTIFICATION OF DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION · Issued 2026-07-20 · Notification dated 20 July; decision order dated 17 July 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
NOTIFICATION OF DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION
Revised proposal; council refusal under appeal · Further-information version assessed in July 2026, distinct from the original description
What the evidence says
The July planner report records a revised proposal of 43 apartments: 34 in Block A and nine in Block B. It gives 4,358 m² proposed floor area and 164.5 m² commercial space. The refusal notice still repeats the original 45-apartment description, so the original and revised quantities remain separate.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: preserves an explicit material revision rather than treating the notice summary as the final schedule.
What is not established
No permitted, commenced or completed apartment total is established.
Terenure planner report including further-information assessment · p.27
The number of apartments is reduced from 45 to 43 · Issued 2026-07-20 · Report dated 20 July 2026; inspected further-information section · Checked 2026-09-05
The number of apartments is reduced from 45 to 43
Historical heating design needs reconciliation · Issue 02 dated 28 January 2026, before the further-information revision and refusal
What the evidence says
The January energy narrative considers air-to-water or exhaust-air heat pumps. Its summary table instead names exhaust-air heat pumps, oversized radiators at 40°C mean water temperature and a 180-litre cylinder. These remain design statements; the selected heating arrangement is not resolved.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: retains concrete emitter and cylinder details without selecting between inconsistent options.
What is not established
A coordinated later services schedule, selected manufacturer and installed system are not established.
Terenure climate action energy statement · p.7
air to water heat pumps · Issued 2026-01-28 · Issue 02; running header retains 19 January; issue box says Tender, not a contract award; received 2026-02-06 · Checked 2026-09-05
air to water heat pumps
Terenure climate action energy statement · p.9
180 litre cylinder · Issued 2026-01-28 · Issue 02; running header retains 19 January; issue box says Tender, not a contract award; received 2026-02-06 · Checked 2026-09-05
180 litre cylinder
Application detail; later status shown separately · January Issue 02 energy table, prior to the assessed revision
What the evidence says
The January table proposes at least 100 mm PIR floor insulation, 110 mm PIR wall insulation and at least 130 mm Xtrodeck flat-roof insulation. These are historical application specifications; the July revision and refusal do not establish an approved or purchased insulation package.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: provides source-specific material details with an explicit version boundary.
What is not established
Later approved assemblies, product substitution and installed thicknesses are not established.
Terenure climate action energy statement · p.9
minimum 100mm PIR · Issued 2026-01-28 · Issue 02; running header retains 19 January; issue box says Tender, not a contract award; received 2026-02-06 · Checked 2026-09-05
minimum 100mm PIR
Application detail; later status shown separately · Lighting calculation dated 16 January 2026, before the revised layout and refusal
What the evidence says
The 16 January lighting model lists six C U Phosco positions at 6 m height: two P852K F2, three P852K P4 and one P863. These are modelled fixtures in the original application, not a purchase order or evidence of installation.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: makes named products useful without overstating current selection.
What is not established
A revised approved lighting layout and final equipment selection remain unverified.
Terenure outdoor lighting model · p.2
C U Phosco · Issued 2026-01-16 · Model dated 16 January 2026; received 2026-02-06 · Checked 2026-09-05
C U Phosco
Application detail; later status shown separately · Original drainage report, revision register dated 28 January 2026; footer still says Rev 2
What the evidence says
The original drainage report lists 67 m³ cellular storage and a 20 m³ detention basin, giving a stated 87 m³ ground-level total against an 81.4 m³ design requirement. Its 55 m³ green-roof interception figure is reported separately and is not added to that stated total here.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: keeps hydraulically different storage components and their published total distinct.
What is not established
A coordinated approved drainage revision, final storage product and installed capacity are not established.
Terenure drainage design report · p.15
Cellular attenuation · Issued 2026-01-28 · Revision register 3 dated 28 January; footer retains Rev 2; received 2026-02-06 · Checked 2026-09-05
Cellular attenuation
Terenure drainage design report · p.24
Total Storage 87cu.m · Issued 2026-01-28 · Revision register 3 dated 28 January; footer retains Rev 2; received 2026-02-06 · Checked 2026-09-05
Total Storage 87cu.m
Selected pages of 5 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. The public council index lists 145 entries. Only selected pages of the 5 supporting PDFs were visually reviewed. Other catalogue entries, complete plans and later compliance are not a complete inspection. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.
Source history
WEB125026
WEB125026
Permission refused
501881
Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.