Galway City Council · 2660211 · Galway
Latest linked evidence
2660211 · Conditional permission
Indexed observation: Granted. Read the linked decisions for their full terms.
This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Reviewed build intelligence
Government document review
Council amendment decision 11 August 2026. No final grant or current appeal outcome is established. Earlier parent development and revised services are kept separate.
3 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-06 · Official file index
Healthcare amendment; council decision recorded, final grant unverified · Galway City 2660211; revisions to the earlier primary-care and Tusla/HSE scheme
What the evidence says
The 11 August 2026 decision concerns amendments to Galway City 22/322 and Commission 318194: a smaller basement, parking changes, relocated electrical rooms, basement ventilation louvres, landscaping and drainage. Condition 1 retains the parent permission’s expiry. This is not approval for a second primary-care development, and the notification expressly is not a final grant.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Healthcare design teams can isolate the changed services and access packages without recounting the parent development.
What is not established
Final grant, any appeal, commencement and completed works are unverified.
Valley Healthcare: amendment decision and four conditions · p.1
amendments to the previously permitted development · Issued 2026-08-11 · Decision on 26/60211; parent 22/322 and Commission 318194 remain distinct; not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-06
amendments to the previously permitted development
Healthcare amendment; council decision recorded, final grant unverified · Surface parking under the amendment; installed chargers and future ducting remain distinct
What the evidence says
The amended layout moves EV charging spaces from the basement to surface level while maintaining overall permitted parking. Condition 2 additionally requires all remaining surface parking spaces to have ducting for future electrical connection points, agreed before commencement. It does not state that every space already has a charger.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Electrical designers can reassess cable routes and future charging provision after the move out of the basement.
What is not established
Final charger count, power ratings, load management, agreed layout and installed provision are unverified.
Valley Healthcare: amendment decision and four conditions · p.3
ducting for electrical connection points · Issued 2026-08-11 · Decision on 26/60211; parent 22/322 and Commission 318194 remain distinct; not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-06
ducting for electrical connection points
Healthcare amendment; council decision recorded, final grant unverified · Relocated electrical rooms within the same healthcare permission
What the evidence says
The decision describes relocation of the ESB substation and LV switchroom from within the Primary Care Centre to a standalone building east of the site. It also includes basement-ventilation louvres. The reviewed decision does not supply transformer ratings, switchgear specifications or ventilation duties.
Why it may matter — interpretation
M&E engineers can check the revised building interface, distribution routes and access requirements for the separate electrical building.
What is not established
Transformer capacity, equipment models, network agreement, cable sizes and detailed ventilation design are unverified.
Valley Healthcare: amendment decision and four conditions · p.1
standalone ESB substation · Issued 2026-08-11 · Decision on 26/60211; parent 22/322 and Commission 318194 remain distinct; not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-06
standalone ESB substation
Healthcare amendment; council decision recorded, final grant unverified · June detailed-design revision to roof drainage on the two buildings
What the evidence says
The 8 June engineering letter says blue-roof systems on both buildings were omitted because they conflicted with plant, rooftop services and PV access and drainage requirements. It substitutes approximately 200 m² of extensive green roof on the Primary Care Centre and 274 m² on the Tusla/HSE building. These are separate building areas; no blue-roof capacity is retained by inference.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Drainage and M&E engineers can coordinate roof storage choices with plant servicing and PV access before relying on the earlier design.
What is not established
Final roof build-up, selected system, approved detailed drawings and installed areas are unverified.
Valley Healthcare: engineering explanation of amended services · p.2
Blue Roof Removal · Issued 2026-06-08 · 251204-PUNCH-XX-XX-C1-XX-001; received 18 June 2026; design and compliance response · Checked 2026-09-06
Blue Roof Removal
Healthcare amendment; council decision recorded, final grant unverified · Sitewide amended attenuation arrangement described by the design engineer
What the evidence says
With the green roofs incorporated, the June letter states a required attenuation-tank volume of 300 m³. The single tank is east of the Primary Care Centre, coordinated with the ambulance station and substation; stone drainage layers beneath SuDS devices also contribute to the wider strategy. The Tusla/HSE hardstanding uses permeable surfaces. These components are not added together as equivalent storage capacities.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Drainage designers and suppliers can compare the stated tank requirement with the revised roof and paving design.
What is not established
Final tank product, hydraulic acceptance, discharge control and verified constructed storage are unverified.
Valley Healthcare: engineering explanation of amended services · p.2
300 m³ · Issued 2026-06-08 · 251204-PUNCH-XX-XX-C1-XX-001; received 18 June 2026; design and compliance response · Checked 2026-09-06
300 m³
Healthcare amendment; council decision recorded, final grant unverified · Amended basement foul drainage, separate from surface-water attenuation
What the evidence says
The same engineering letter introduces a foul pumping station below the basement slab with 24-hour emergency storage provision. It does not provide pump duty, chamber volume, redundancy or control-panel specifications on the reviewed page.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Wastewater engineers can check emergency-storage and maintenance-access requirements before selecting pumps and controls.
What is not established
Pump model, duty, standby arrangement, calculated volume, controls and installed performance are unverified.
Valley Healthcare: engineering explanation of amended services · p.2
24-hour emergency storage · Issued 2026-06-08 · 251204-PUNCH-XX-XX-C1-XX-001; received 18 June 2026; design and compliance response · Checked 2026-09-06
24-hour emergency storage
Healthcare amendment; council decision recorded, final grant unverified · October 2025 model submitted with the June 2026 amendment
What the evidence says
The model dated 28 October 2025 and received 18 June 2026 lists 4 Disano 3460 Denia PRO 1 fittings at 18 W, 10 Disano 3462 Denia PRO 1 cycleway fittings at 18 W, and 25 Disano 3465 Denia PRO 1 large-area fittings at 25 W. All three groups are labelled 4000 K. These are modelled quantities in the submitted design, not an installed inventory or a newly verified lighting revision.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Lighting designers can compare the named optics, wattages and colour temperature against any later approved layout.
What is not established
Later lighting changes, installation, supplier appointment and on-site light levels are unverified.
Valley Health Primary Care Centre: public-lighting calculation · p.3
Denia PRO 1 · Issued 2025-10-28 · DIALux xma100 model; received 18 June 2026; no later revision inferred · Checked 2026-09-06
Denia PRO 1
Healthcare amendment; council decision recorded, final grant unverified · Council-conditioned boundary treatment; detailed noise assessment not inspected in this increment
What the evidence says
Condition 3 requires acoustic panels on the indicated walls and boundaries before building occupation, with qualified-engineer supervision and a photographic installation report for council agreement. The condition does not identify a panel product, sound rating or supplier.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Acoustic and envelope specialists can identify the evidence needed to demonstrate that the boundary treatment was installed.
What is not established
Panel build-up, tested rating, detailed locations, final agreement and installation certification are unverified.
Valley Healthcare: amendment decision and four conditions · p.3
acoustic panels · Issued 2026-08-11 · Decision on 26/60211; parent 22/322 and Commission 318194 remain distinct; not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-06
acoustic panels
Selected pages of 3 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. 59 catalogue rows retained. Selected pages of three PDFs were visually inspected. The full noise assessment, stormwater-audit file and complete drawing set were not comprehensively reviewed. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.
Source history
2660211
2660211
Conditional permission
Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.