Galway County Council · 2561652
Latest linked evidence
2561652 · Conditional permission
This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Reviewed build intelligence
Government document review
The July decision concerns retention of partial works and completion of the existing 17/1516 scheme: 16 apartments and an 11-bedroom B&B. It does not represent a second additional residential scheme.
3 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-07 · Official file index
Retention and completion of parent 17/1516
What the evidence says
The 28 July decision concerns retention of partial construction under expired permission 17/1516 and completion of 16 apartments with a separate 586.17 m², 11-bedroom B&B. The planner records substantial construction observed at the November 2025 site visit. The notification expressly is not a final grant.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Builders and suppliers should establish the remaining works rather than count the parent and this completion case as separate housing supply.
What is not established
Final grant, current remaining-work quantities, apartment completion and occupation are not established.
Retention and completion decision notification · p.1
partial construction ... permission ref. 17/1516 · Issued 2026-07-28 · Signed 28 July 2026; 26 conditions; no final grant in reviewed index · Checked 2026-09-07
partial construction ... permission ref. 17/1516
Planner report recording partial construction · p.1
Substantial construction has occurred on site · Issued 2026-07-27 · Signed 27 July; indexed 29 July; inspected passage records 21 November 2025 site visit · Checked 2026-09-07
Substantial construction has occurred on site
Pre-commencement revision required by the July decision
What the evidence says
Condition 5 requires an agreed revised layout diverting the existing north–south storm line that traverses the building. A new 300 mm concrete pipe is to run from the northern boundary along the eastern LP1320 boundary and connect to the southern outfall with associated chambers.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Civil contractors need to resolve this existing-service conflict, outfall connection and maintenance access before fixing the siteworks sequence.
What is not established
Council agreement to the revised alignment, diversion completion and final grant are not established.
Retention and completion decision notification · p.2
Condition 5(i) · Issued 2026-07-28 · Signed 28 July 2026; 26 conditions; no final grant in reviewed index · Checked 2026-09-07
Condition 5(i)
Retention and completion decision notification · p.3
new 300mm piped concrete line · Issued 2026-07-28 · Signed 28 July 2026; 26 conditions; no final grant in reviewed index · Checked 2026-09-07
new 300mm piped concrete line
Roads conditions on the retention/completion decision
What the evidence says
Condition 5 requires new crossings and segregated routes between parking and the building, relocated accessible bays to address the internal bend, and a western turning area. Condition 6 requires agreed road-interface designs and road safety audits.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Roads and landscape teams need the agreed revised layout before using the July FI drawing as a construction setting-out plan.
What is not established
An agreed revised layout, road safety audit acceptance and completed public-road works were not reviewed.
Retention and completion decision notification · p.3
Condition 5(ii)-(iv); Condition 6 · Issued 2026-07-28 · Signed 28 July 2026; 26 conditions; no final grant in reviewed index · Checked 2026-09-07
Condition 5(ii)-(iv); Condition 6
June 2026 further-information drainage layout
What the evidence says
Revision F of drawing 3.002 identifies a cellular attenuation tank with 162 m³ total storage, a Class 1 bypass interceptor and a flow-control device restricting discharge to 2 litres per second. These are submitted design provisions subject to the subsequent decision, including the required storm-line diversion.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Drainage suppliers have a defined proposed storage and flow-control interface for clarification against the final coordinated design.
What is not established
Installed products, final sizing approval and supplier orders are not established; named examples on the drawing do not prove product selection.
Further-information site layout and roof plan · p.1
CELLULAR STORAGE ATTENUATION TANK ... 162m3; 2 LITRES/SECOND · Issued 2026-06-30 · 16023 drawing 3.002 revision F, updated for planning FI 30 June 2026; base sheet August 2017; received 2 July · Checked 2026-09-07
CELLULAR STORAGE ATTENUATION TANK ... 162m3; 2 LITRES/SECOND
The declared pages of these government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Other catalogue files, later compliance, procurement and installed specifications were not established. Historical weekly membership is retained separately from these document dates.
Source history
2561652
2561652
Conditional permission
Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.