South Dublin County Council · SD25A0302W · Dublin
Latest linked evidence
SD25A0302W · Permission refused
Open official sourceIndexed observation: Refuse Permission. Read the linked decisions for their full terms.
This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Reviewed build intelligence
Government document review
A 398 m² warehouse extension was refused on 4 September after the August vehicle and parking revision. This is not active permitted supply.
3 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-07 · Official file index
Council refusal dated 4 September 2026
What the evidence says
Order 1014 refuses the west-side extension in the unused yard. Its description specifies 398 m², 8 m clear internal height and 9 m maximum external height, compared with the existing 6.85 m warehouse. These dimensions describe the refused proposal.
Why it may matter — interpretation
A revised planning route is needed before treating the extension as executable work.
What is not established
An appeal, replacement proposal, reversal of refusal or commencement was not established.
Signed refusal of permission · p.1
Order 1014; Development; refuse permission · Issued 2026-09-04 · Order 1014; signed 4 September; catalogue upload 7 September · Checked 2026-09-07
Order 1014; Development; refuse permission
One council refusal ground
What the evidence says
The single refusal ground spans pages 1–2: the internal-yard layout and vehicle movements introduce risk to yard users and would create a traffic hazard, contrary to traffic safety and public safety. The refusal followed the August clarification response.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Transport specialists can focus any redesign on safe movements and the interaction between vehicles and other yard users.
What is not established
A safe replacement arrangement or council acceptance of one was not reviewed.
Signed refusal of permission · p.1
REASON; internal yard layout · Issued 2026-09-04 · Order 1014; signed 4 September; catalogue upload 7 September · Checked 2026-09-07
REASON; internal yard layout
Signed refusal of permission · p.2
traffic hazard; public safety · Issued 2026-09-04 · Order 1014; signed 4 September; catalogue upload 7 September · Checked 2026-09-07
traffic hazard; public safety
Historical August revision within the refused application
What the evidence says
The response reduced four parking spaces to three, including a relocated accessible bay, and added a 1.2 m pedestrian walkway. Drawing C-0004 PL3 models a light van making a three-point turn and reversing to the new door. These submitted arrangements belong to the proposal subsequently refused on 4 September.
Why it may matter — interpretation
The drawing records what was tested; a future redesign should not treat this manoeuvre or parking layout as approved.
What is not established
The applicant’s delivery-frequency and swept-path statements are not independent safety validation. No accepted replacement layout is established.
Response to clarification request · p.2
Parking; pedestrian walkway; 3 point turn · Issued 2026-08-06 · Cover dated 6 August; received 10 August; PL3 drawings · Checked 2026-09-07
Parking; pedestrian walkway; 3 point turn
Revised layout and swept path · p.1
C-0004 PL3; Light Van · Issued 2026-08-05 · D1854-KB-XX-XX-DR-C-0004 PL3; issued 5 August; received 10 August · Checked 2026-09-07
C-0004 PL3; Light Van
Signed refusal of permission · p.2
refusal reason continued · Issued 2026-09-04 · Order 1014; signed 4 September; catalogue upload 7 September · Checked 2026-09-07
refusal reason continued
The declared pages of these government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Other catalogue files, later compliance, procurement and installed specifications were not established. Historical weekly membership is retained separately from these document dates.
Source history
SD25A0302W
SD25A0302W
Permission refused
Evidence
Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.