Meath County Council · 2560781
Latest linked evidence
A dated lifecycle event is not available from the current public records.
This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Reviewed build intelligence
Government document review
Council decision dated 4 August 2026 with 31 conditions, expressly not a final grant. Official Commission case 501978 records an appeal lodged on 26 August 2026, due by 7 January 2027. Original 2025 engineering values remain historical where later conditions require revised design.
2 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-05 · Official file index
Council condition; appeal pending · Exact application 25/60781; later conditioned quantity distinguished from the repeated proposal
What the evidence says
Condition 2 of the 4 August 2026 decision explicitly sets 56 residential units. The opening description repeats the earlier 62-home proposal for the mixed residential, retail, pharmacy, café, medical and community development. Condition 1 incorporates the revised plans received on 29 May and 10 June 2026. The two quantities belong to different parts of the same decision and are not added together.
Exact application 25/60781; later conditioned quantity distinguished from the repeated proposal
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: replaces a misleading single scheme total with an evidenced revision relationship.
What is not established
The pending appeal may change the result; no final permission, commencement or completed homes are established.
Old Mill Julianstown: council decision and 31 conditions · p.1
62 dwellings · Issued 2026-08-04 · Council decision incorporating plans received 29 May and 10 June 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
62 dwellings
Old Mill Julianstown: council decision and 31 conditions · p.4
56 no. residential units · Issued 2026-08-04 · Council decision incorporating plans received 29 May and 10 June 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
56 no. residential units
Council condition; appeal pending · Council condition 5 for the mixed-use development
What the evidence says
Condition 5 requires development to follow the phasing drawing received on 29 May 2026 unless otherwise agreed in writing. The cited drawing ends A-9204-A1-P01. This is a requirement to follow a plan, not evidence that a phase has begun.
Council condition 5 for the mixed-use development
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: provides a precise next document for understanding delivery sequence.
What is not established
The selected review has not established the individual phase quantities, agreed changes, actual starts or completion.
Old Mill Julianstown: council decision and 31 conditions · p.4
29/05/2026 · Issued 2026-08-04 · Council decision incorporating plans received 29 May and 10 June 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
29/05/2026
Council condition; appeal pending · Later council revision requirement and explicitly original west/east catchment design
What the evidence says
Condition 6 accepts the surface-water system in principle but requires a revised attenuation design and agreement on SuDS features. The earlier June 2025 report proposed west-catchment tanks and swales of 256 m³ and 70 m³, limited to a combined 2.6 litres per second, plus a separate east-catchment 40 m³ tank and 65 litres per second outflow. These remain historical design values pending the required revision.
Later council revision requirement and explicitly original west/east catchment design
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: identifies both the original civil design and why its quantities cannot be treated as final.
What is not established
The agreed revised attenuation volumes, discharge controls, final layout and installed system were not established.
Old Mill Julianstown: council decision and 31 conditions · p.4
revised surface water design · Issued 2026-08-04 · Council decision incorporating plans received 29 May and 10 June 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
revised surface water design
Old Mill Julianstown: Engineering Services Report · p.19
256m3 and 70m3 · Issued 2025-06-11 · P1 Planning Issue; original design before later amendments; received 2025-07-25 · Checked 2026-09-05
256m3 and 70m3
Council condition; appeal pending · Council flood-management condition for the River Nanny site
What the evidence says
Condition 7 requires agreed floor and ground levels, updated site sections and, where needed, revised hydraulic modelling. It also requires compensatory flood-storage proposals and measures for the flood-evacuation plan, with that plan issued before first occupation. These are conditions for future compliance rather than proof that mitigation has been delivered.
Council flood-management condition for the River Nanny site
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: distinguishes a conditioned flood strategy from an approved final detail or completed mitigation.
What is not established
Agreed compensatory storage, final model, installed levels and issued occupation-stage plan were not established.
Old Mill Julianstown: council decision and 31 conditions · p.5
compensatory flood storage measures · Issued 2026-08-04 · Council decision incorporating plans received 29 May and 10 June 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
compensatory flood storage measures
Council condition; appeal pending · Council transportation condition 8(e) and 8(f)
What the evidence says
Condition 8 requires four fully functional EV charging points and infrastructure capable of accommodating future charging at 20% of the total parking-space count. Those are separate requirements; the 20% is not a count of operational chargers.
Council transportation condition 8(e) and 8(f)
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: separates installed-capability requirements from future-ready provision.
What is not established
The total final parking count, charger model, supplier, installation and operation were not established.
Old Mill Julianstown: council decision and 31 conditions · p.6
four fully functional charging points · Issued 2026-08-04 · Council decision incorporating plans received 29 May and 10 June 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
four fully functional charging points
Council condition; appeal pending · Protected Old Mill and Mill House conservation requirements
What the evidence says
Condition 9 requires safe access, a detailed condition survey addressing structural integrity and building fabric, then a repair and conservation specification for written agreement. Condition 11 separately requires agreed samples of external finishes before work. This does not establish a final materials palette or completed restoration.
Protected Old Mill and Mill House conservation requirements
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: makes the survey, restoration and sample-approval work visible without treating a concept report as a final specification.
What is not established
The agreed repair specification, approved finish samples, selected products and completed conservation works were not established.
Old Mill Julianstown: council decision and 31 conditions · p.7
detailed condition survey · Issued 2026-08-04 · Council decision incorporating plans received 29 May and 10 June 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05
detailed condition survey
Selected pages of 2 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. The exact council index lists 233 document rows. Only cited pages of 2 selected government-published PDFs establish these findings; the remaining catalogue has not been reviewed. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.
Source history
Dates have not been established for the linked records below.
Evidence
Case dates are not available in the current source coverage.
Open official recordOnly exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.