Connected planning records

~14 dwellings, Dock Road, Corcanree, Limerick - Planning Application 2660307

Limerick City and County Council · 2660307 · Limerick

Latest linked evidence

Planning decision · 2026-08-11

2660307 · Conditional permission

Open official source

Indexed observation: Granted. Read the linked decisions for their full terms.

This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.

Reviewed build intelligence

What the documents establish

Government document review

The 11 August notice is a decision to grant amendments to parent 22/1280, not final permission. Three larger commercial blocks are the amendment scope; household and whole-park quantities are not implied.

5 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-07 · Official file index

Decision consolidates three blocks within the existing permitted park

Amendment to parent 22/1280, not a new standalone commercial park

What the evidence says
The August decision describes amalgamation within Blocks A, B1 and H into one unit in each block, alongside reduced floor areas, increased heights, signage and a substation. The July response states gross internal areas of 4,611 m² for A, 1,632 m² for B1 and 2,860 m² for H. Condition 3 retains the parent permission and its expiry in June 2030. The notice is expressly not final permission.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Commercial and shell contractors should separate the three amalgamated blocks from unchanged parent works before scheduling packages.

What is not established
Final grant, a reconciled count of all parent commercial units and actual commencement are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Decision notification and conditions · p.1
A, B1 and H amalgamation and other amendments · Issued 2026-08-11 · Signed 11 August; incorporates FI received 15 July; no final grant established · Checked 2026-09-07

A, B1 and H amalgamation and other amendments

Decision notification and conditions · p.2
Notice is not a grant of permission · Issued 2026-08-11 · Signed 11 August; incorporates FI received 15 July; no final grant established · Checked 2026-09-07

Notice is not a grant of permission

Decision notification and conditions · p.3
Condition 3: parent 22/1280 and expiry 21 June 2030 · Issued 2026-08-11 · Signed 11 August; incorporates FI received 15 July; no final grant established · Checked 2026-09-07

Condition 3: parent 22/1280 and expiry 21 June 2030

Further-information response on block areas and uses · p.1
GIA: A 4611 m², B1 1632 m², H 2860 m² · Issued 2026-07-15 · FI response dated and received 15 July · Checked 2026-09-07

GIA: A 4611 m², B1 1632 m², H 2860 m²

The application leaves final tenant uses unresolved

Applicant clarification incorporated as FI, subject to the governing permission

What the evidence says
The July response says the exact uses depend on market interest. It retains Block H as a logistics warehouse and describes potential A and B1 uses within the parent permission, including light industry, research, manufacturing, workshops and medical or business supply. This is indicative use context rather than confirmed occupiers or operational fit-out.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Mechanical, electrical and interior suppliers should qualify requirements against an eventual tenant brief instead of assuming a named industrial process.

What is not established
Tenants, final process loads, laboratory classifications, HVAC capacities and operational commissioning are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Further-information response on block areas and uses · p.2
Item 2: exact uses not determined; Block H logistics and indicative A/B1 uses · Issued 2026-07-15 · FI response dated and received 15 July · Checked 2026-09-07

Item 2: exact uses not determined; Block H logistics and indicative A/B1 uses

Planning sections show taller steel portals and insulated cladding

March revision 00 building proposals; final structural and tenant coordination remains open

What the evidence says
The A100 section overlays the lower previously permitted outline against the taller proposed portal-frame structure. Its outline specification identifies 100 mm insulated wall cladding and 120 mm insulated roof panels with rooflight provision. H100 plans show a small first-floor office area beside the main operational void and a roof with falls, rooflights and fall-arrest provision. The drawings are marked for planning and not for construction.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Steelwork, cladding and access teams can identify the larger-height shell and roof interfaces while preserving detailed engineering and tenant requirements.

What is not established
Construction-issued structural design, final cladding selection, fire strategy and installed roof-access systems are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Building A100 sections · p.1
2950-P-3011 rev 00: portal frame, previous outline and outline envelope specification · Issued 2026-03-06 · 2950-P-3011 revision 00; issued for planning 6 March; received 20 March · Checked 2026-09-07

2950-P-3011 rev 00: portal frame, previous outline and outline envelope specification

Building H100 first floor and roof plan · p.1
2950-P-1114 rev 00: office beside operational void and roof layout · Issued 2026-03-06 · 2950-P-1114 revision 00; issued for planning 6 March; received 20 March · Checked 2026-09-07

2950-P-1114 rev 00: office beside operational void and roof layout

FI drainage remains subject to independent audits and completion certification

Submitted whole-park drainage design and later decision conditions; audit acceptance not proved

What the evidence says
The July P04 drawing lays out attenuation tanks, rain gardens, bioretention, permeable paving and controlled outfalls across the park. Condition 4 still requires a revised independent Stage 1 storm-water audit and a Stage 2 detailed-design audit before development. Each completed phase requires certification and a Stage 3 audit before use, with an agreed maintenance plan.

Why it may matter — interpretation
Civil and landscape teams need the independently reviewed drainage details and phased certification in the mobilisation and handover programme.

What is not established
Accepted audits, final tank and outfall design, maintenance agreement and completed SuDS are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Proposed storm-water layout, revised for FI · p.1
P04 S2 proposed storm-water layout: tanks, SuDS and controlled outfalls · Issued 2026-07-08 · 25319-MMS-ZZ-ST-DR-C-10003 revision P04, S2, issued for RFI 8 July; received 15 July · Checked 2026-09-07

P04 S2 proposed storm-water layout: tanks, SuDS and controlled outfalls

Decision notification and conditions · p.3
Condition 4(a): revised independent Stage 1 audit · Issued 2026-08-11 · Signed 11 August; incorporates FI received 15 July; no final grant established · Checked 2026-09-07

Condition 4(a): revised independent Stage 1 audit

Decision notification and conditions · p.4
Condition 4(b-e): design audit, maintenance, certification and completion audit · Issued 2026-08-11 · Signed 11 August; incorporates FI received 15 July; no final grant established · Checked 2026-09-07

Condition 4(b-e): design audit, maintenance, certification and completion audit
Remaining document questions
  • Have final permission, tenant briefs and the independent drainage audits been issued?

The declared pages of these government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Other catalogue files, later compliance, procurement and installed specifications were not established. Historical weekly membership is retained separately from these document dates.

Source history

Timeline

  1. Planning application received

    2660307

    Official source

  2. Planning decision

    2660307

    Conditional permission

    Official source

What this record establishes

Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.

Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.