Connected planning records

~14 dwellings, Schoolhouse Lane, Swords, Co. Dublin - Planning Application F26A/0738E

Fingal County Council · F26A0738E · Dublin

SavePlanning record details

Latest linked evidence

Planning application invalidated · 2026-08-24

F26A0738E · The reviewed council letter says this submission is invalid. This is not a refusal on its planning merits.

Open official source

Council invalidated this application; this is not a refusal on its planning merits · 2026-08-24. Read the exact council evidence in the timeline.

Indexed observation: Invalid Application. The reviewed validity evidence above qualifies this index label.

This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.

Reviewed build intelligence

What the documents establish

Government document review

14 units are proposed in this invalid application, not a current permitted total. W34 ingestion 20 August precedes invalidity 24 August; W35 ingestion 27 August records the later status. Exact related records F24A/0582E and F25A/0156E appear in the council index but no technical equivalence or unit join is inferred.

1 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-07 · Official file index

The 14-apartment application was invalidated

Invalid application; no permission established · Exact 2026 Schoolhouse Lane application; invalidity concerns notice requirements, not a refusal on design merits.

What the evidence says
The council invalidated F26A/0738E on 24 August 2026 because the newspaper notice gave incorrect inspection-location information and omitted the required notice that the Natura impact statement was available for inspection or purchase. The 14 apartments remain the invalidated proposal, not an approved unit total.

Why it may matter — interpretation
For project tracking: a valid resubmission is needed before this reference can be treated as a live permission application; do not interpret invalidity as council rejection of the building design.

What is not established
The current catalogue exposes only the decision and executive order. Structural system, envelope materials, drainage details, revised submission, permission, procurement, commencement and completion remain unestablished. Related 2024 and 2025 records are not assumed equivalent or counted together.

Inspect the evidence

Decision in respect of an invalid application · p.1
Decision and proposal · Issued 2026-08-24 · Decision order PF/2394/26, 24 August 2026 · Checked 2026-09-07

Invalid application; 14 apartments

Decision in respect of an invalid application · p.2
Reasons1and2 · Issued 2026-08-24 · Decision order PF/2394/26, 24 August 2026 · Checked 2026-09-07

Article 18(1)(e); Article 239
Remaining document questions
  • Identify a valid resubmission from an explicit official record.
  • Review that submission’s actual architectural and engineering drawings.

Exact Fingal record 105521, two-document catalogue and two related-reference rows checked. All three pages of the invalidity notification visually reviewed. Drawings and technical reports are not present in the current visible catalogue; technical detail review is source-blocked. No council design-merits conclusion inferred from procedural invalidity.

Source history

Timeline

  1. Planning application received

    F26A0738E

    Official source

  2. Planning application invalidated

    F26A0738E

    The reviewed council letter says this submission is invalid. This is not a refusal on its planning merits.

    This exact planning application only.

    Official source

What this record establishes

Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.

Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.