Refusal decisions · 3–9 Aug 2026

43Refusals
43Substantive reasons
0Verification only
0Document not published
0Portal unavailable
0Manual review

37 of these refusals have page-cited grounds from a checked review. Browse the decision-date inventory.

What this means

Applications were most often refused because the proposal did not fit its site or surroundings, conflicted with zoning or rural-housing policy, created access or road-safety problems, lacked enough technical evidence to demonstrate its impacts were acceptable or harmed the amenity of neighbouring homes.

43 of 43 records carry official reason text

79 published statements, 1.8 per analysed application

21 refused on more than one ground, up to 6

Most common pairs

  1. 16 Design + Zoning/policy
  2. 14 Design + Transport/access
  3. 11 Design + Residential amenity

All ten refusal themes

Applications · statements
  1. 01 Design, scale, character or visual impact 28
  2. 02 Zoning, land use, settlement policy or rural housing need 19
  3. 03 Traffic, access, parking or road safety 19
  4. 04 Missing or insufficient evidence, surveys or technical detail 17
  5. 05 Residential amenity, privacy, light or noise 16
  6. 06 Wastewater, effluent, groundwater or public health 15
  7. 07 Unauthorised development, retention or procedural history 15
  8. 08 Surface-water drainage or flood risk 6
  9. 09 Ecology, habitats or Natura impacts 6
  10. 10 Built heritage or archaeology 4

Refusal decisions · 3–9 Aug 2026

8 of 8 cards shown · 42 case links · 43 linked projects

Refused

Post Office Road, Lusk, Co. Dublin, K45 V324, Dublin

Post Office Road, Lusk, Co. Dublin, K45 V324

Fingal County Council · F26A/0510E

What was proposed

Permission is sought for (i) removal of existing bungalow roof, (ii) d

Refusal reason

The proposed development, by reason of its design and appearance, represents an incongruous form of development which fails to provide for the sensitive design approach required to protect the established character of the Lusk Architectural Conservation Area (ACA). The proposed development would be visually intrusive at this prominent corner site and would result in undue negative impacts on the visual amenities of the area and on the Lusk ACA. The proposed development would be contrary to the “TC” zoning objective, Policies SPQHP41, HCAP14 & HCAP15, Objectives SPQHO45, HCAO24 & DMSO186, Section 14.10.2 and Table 14.24 of the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029 and, therefore, would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. NOTE: The description of the development is considered misleading in that the proposal is, in essence a replacement dwelling given the limited aspects of original building to be retained and the extent and impact of new interventions and new construction.

Official refusal decision — published grounds
Refused

Lands featuring as part of The Paddocks Residential Development and, L, Dublin

Lands featuring as part of The Paddocks Residential Development and, L

Fingal County Council · F26A/0509E

What was proposed

A residential scheme providing 12 no. units in total. The scheme compr

Refusal reason

The proposed development, by virtue of its design and layout and particularly its relationship to adjacent Community Infrastructure zoned lands to the west, is considered to represent unsustainable and undesirable development of the site which would prejudice the future development of the adjoining CI lands. The proposal would contravene materally Table 14.4: Infill Development and Objective SPQHO42 Development of Underutilised Infill, Corner and Backland Sites of the Fingal Development Plan 2023–2029, and if permitted, would set an undesirable precedent for similar forms of development, contrary to the principles of proper planning and sustainable development in the area

Official refusal decision — published grounds
Refused

1a Robinhood Park, Longmile Road, Dublin 22, D22 P5P8, Dublin

1a Robinhood Park, Longmile Road, Dublin 22, D22 P5P8

South Dublin County Council · SD26A/0141W

What was proposed

The replacement of the existing west-facing advertising display (6m wide x 3m high) with a digital advertising display (6m wide x 3m high with a depth of 0.25m) and the permanent removal of the existing east facing advertising display including all associated site works and services.

Refusal reason

Having regard to the provisions of the South Dublin County Development Plan 2022-2028, in particular Section 12.5.7 Advertising, Corporate and Public Information and the assessment criteria set out in Table 12.19, the proposed digital advertising display would represent a piecemeal approach to the provision of digital signage, would fail to comply with the policies and standards of the County Development Plan and would, by reason of the nature of the development and its location adjacent to a heavily trafficked major road, create a traffic hazard and adversely affect road safety. The proposed development would, therefore, be contrary to the South Dublin County Development Plan 2022-2028 and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official decision evidence
Refused

22, Fox & Geese, Naas Road, Dublin 22, D22AY63, Dublin

22, Fox & Geese, Naas Road, Dublin 22, D22AY63

South Dublin County Council · SD26A/0140W

What was proposed

The replacement of the existing east facing advertising display (6m wide x 3m high) with a digital advertising display (6m wide x 3m high with a depth of 0.25m) and the permanent removal of the existing west facing advertising display including all associated site works and services.

Refusal reason

Having regard to the provisions of the South Dublin County Development Plan 2022-2028, in particular Section 12.5.7 Advertising, Corporate and Public Information and the assessment criteria set out in Table 12.19, the proposed digital advertising display would represent a piecemeal approach to the provisiosn of digital signage, would fail to comply with the policies and standards of the County Development Plan and would, by reason of the nature of the development and its location adjacent to a heavily trafficked major road, create a traffic hazard and adversely affect road safety. The proposed development would, therefore, be contrary to the South Dublin County Development Plan 2022-2028 and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official decision evidence
Refused

The Clonsilla Inn, Weavers Row, Clonsilla Road, Clonsilla, Dublin 15, Dublin

The Clonsilla Inn, Weavers Row, Clonsilla Road, Clonsilla, Dublin 15

Fingal County Council · FW26A/0247E

What was proposed

The development will consist of façade upgrade works comprising the in

Refusal reason

The subject site is zoned “TC” Town and District Centre with the objective to “protect and enhance the special physical and social character of town and district centres and provide and/or improve urban facilities” within the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029. The two-storey high structural frame with timber trellis by virtue of its design, appearance and materiality, is haphazard, overly dominant, deficient in quality and is an incongruous form of development at odds with the visual amenity of Clonsilla Road. The proposed balcony feature at the first-floor will result in significant overlooking and loss of privacy impact on the private rear amenity serving the neighbouring dwelling to the north-west. Therefore, the development will seriously injure the neighbouring residential amenity and depreciate the value of the neighbouring property. As such, the development contravenes the “TC” Town and District Centre zoning objective, Section 14.4.5, Table 14.1 & Objective GINHO59 of the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029 and will set an inappropriate precedent for other similar forms of development. The development is therefore contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official refusal decision — published grounds
Refused

35 Shelton Drive, Kimmage, Dublin, D12 EK44, Dublin

35 Shelton Drive, Kimmage, Dublin, D12 EK44

South Dublin County Council · SD26B/0291W

What was proposed

Demolish garage; Construct a single-storey side extension; Add door and windows to the rear extension, and any required ancillary works.

Refusal reason

Having regard to the location of the existing public surface water pipe on the site, the siting of the proposed development over same, and IE3 Objective 2 of the South Dublin County Development Plan 2022-2028, the Planning Authority is not satisfied that the proposed development would not be prejudicial to public health.

Official decision evidence
Refused

Lands (c. 11.86 Ha) at St Margarets Road (R122), and within the townla, Dublin

Lands (c. 11.86 Ha) at St Margarets Road (R122), and within the townla

Fingal County Council · FW26A/0033E

What was proposed

Nocsy 5 Limited intend to apply for permission for development of land

Refusal reasons
  1. The Planning Authority is not satisfied, based on the information submitted, that the proposed development would not adversely affect the operation and safety of the National (N2 and M50 motorway) and Regional (R122) Road Routes. The development would therefore be contrary to Objectives DMSO115 and CMO40 of the Fingal Development Plan 2023 – 2029. The proposed development, by itself or by the precedent which the grant of permission for it would set for other relevant development, would adversely affect the use of a national road or other major road by traffic. The proposed development would therefore be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  2. The proposed development, in relation to Plot 3 of the application site, by virtue of the scale and nature of the external storage use together with the lack of sufficient information in relation to the end user, would seriously injure the visual amenities of the area and adjoining properties and would be contrary to the GE Zoning Objective, Section 14.15.1, Table 14.15, Objective DMSO89 and Policy EEP2 of the Fingal Development Plan 2023 – 2029 in respect of design in industrial areas, setting an undesirable precedent for other similar development, and would not be considered the best economic use of the GE zoned lands. The proposed development would therefore be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  3. The Planning Authority is not satisfied, given the lack of information submitted, that the proposed development would not adversely affect the conservation and preservation of a European Site, is contrary to Objective DMSO145 of the Fingal Development Plan 2023 – 2029 and therefore contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official refusal decision — published grounds
Refused

45 Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, A94P8H3, Dublin

45 Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, A94P8H3

Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council · D26A/0443/WEB

What was proposed

The development subject to planning permission shall consist of; •1no. new frees

Refusal reason

I recommend REFUSAL OF PERMISSION for A new freestanding projecting sign to the front, under the Planning & Development, Act 2000, (as amended), for the following reasons: 1. The proposed freestanding signage located within the front curtilage of the property is not considered sympathetic to the predominately residential nature of the immediate area and Zoning Objective 'A' of the application site. The proposed development if permitted would appear visually dominant and incongruous with the subject property and the adjoining 2 no. sets of semi-detached dwellings and would result in unnecessary visual clutter along a predominantly residential area of Rock Road. Accordingly, the freestanding signage proposed does not comply with Section 12.6.8.5 Free-Standing and Outdoor Advertisement Displays of the Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County Development Plan 2022-2028 and therefore would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official decision evidence
Official link not supplied Planning case · D26A/0443/WEB