Historical edition · Complete

2026-W35 · revision 20260906T175255Z-refusal-orders-v1-2026-w35

Coverage through 4 Sep 2026

Refusal decisions · 24–30 Aug 2026

54Refusals
54Substantive reasons
0Verification only
0Document not published
0Portal unavailable
0Manual review

What this means

Applications were most often refused because the proposal did not fit its site or surroundings, lacked enough technical evidence to demonstrate its impacts were acceptable, conflicted with zoning or rural-housing policy, created access or road-safety problems or harmed the amenity of neighbouring homes.

54 of 54 records carry official reason text

109 published statements, 2.0 per analysed application

29 refused on more than one ground, up to 6

Most common pairs

  1. 19 Design + Missing evidence
  2. 19 Design + Residential amenity
  3. 18 Design + Zoning/policy

All ten refusal themes

Applications · statements
  1. 01 Design, scale, character or visual impact 37
  2. 02 Missing or insufficient evidence, surveys or technical detail 24
  3. 03 Zoning, land use, settlement policy or rural housing need 23
  4. 04 Traffic, access, parking or road safety 22
  5. 05 Residential amenity, privacy, light or noise 20
  6. 06 Wastewater, effluent, groundwater or public health 13
  7. 07 Unauthorised development, retention or procedural history 13
  8. 08 Surface-water drainage or flood risk 11
  9. 09 Ecology, habitats or Natura impacts 10
  10. 10 Built heritage or archaeology 6

Refusal decisions · 24–30 Aug 2026

2 of 2 cards shown · 49 case links · 54 lead matches

Refused

Moneygashel, Blacklion, Co. Cavan, Cavan

Moneygashel, Blacklion, Co. Cavan

Cavan County Council · 2660380

What was proposed

for RETENTION Permission for (a) demolition of former dwelling house and retention of new existing two storey replacement dwelling (b) retain upgrade works to existing site entrance and complete with sightline improvement works together with planning PERMISSION to decommission existing septic tank and install new waste water treatment system and percolation area and associated site works

Refusal reason

Having regard to the nature of the retained development, which includes the demolition of what appeared to be an older vernacular dwelling and where the reuse of original known features is not evident, it is considered that the retained development contravenes Objectives VA 1, VA 2 and RDR 01 of the Cavan County Development Plan 2022-2028, has resulted in a loss of a traditional building which contributed to the unique character, heritage and identity of the local area and is contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official decision evidence
Refused

Maghera, Virginia, Co.Cavan, Cavan

Maghera, Virginia, Co.Cavan

Cavan County Council · 2660203

What was proposed

for the demolition of the existing two storey 2 bedroom detached derelict, uninhabited and uninhabitable residential dwelling and the construction of a new part two storey with a pitched roof and part single storey with a flat roof 5 bedroom detached dwelling, a new waste water treatment system and trenched percolation area and all necessary ancillary site development works the vehicular entrance is from an existing private lane

Refusal reasons
  1. Having regard to Virginia Bypass Development Objectives VB 01 and VB 02 as set out in the Cavan County Development Plan 2022 – 2028 which require Cavan County Council to work in conjunction with Transport Infrastructure Ireland and Meath County Council to reserve and protect option corridors from development that would interfere with the delivery of the Virginia By-Pass, it is considered that the proposed development would be premature pending the determination by the Planning Authority or the Road Authority of a road layout for the area or any part thereof.
  2. It is considered that the proposed replacement of a traditional vernacular two- storey dwelling on this elevated exposed site by a new dwelling which, in the opinion of the Planning Authority, would not have sufficient regard to the design and character of the existing dwelling or to the guidance on design form and proportions included in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the “Design Guide for Rural One-Off Developments in Cavan Countryside”, would fail to meet the relevant criteria of Objective RDR 03 of the Cavan County Development Plan 2022 – 2028 one of which is that the design of replacement dwellings in rural areas shall have regard to the design, finish and character of the existing building and comply with the ‘Cavan Rural Design Guide’, or any such replacement document. The proposed development, and the precedent which it would form, would therefore be considered contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  3. Having regard to insufficient information submitted in relation to stormwater drainage design and attenuation capacity for the proposed development, and to adequately ensure that any future drainage infrastructure associated with the Bypass Scheme can safely accommodate the additional flow arising from the proposed development, it has not been adequately demonstrated to the Planning Authority that the proposed development would not give rise to surcharge or increased flood risk downgradient from the proposed development. It is considered, therefore, that the proposed development would be contrary to Objective WQG 07 of the Cavan County Development Plan 2022 – 2028 which is to ensure that development would not have an unacceptable impact on water quality and quantity including surface water, ground water, designated source protection areas and river corridors; and would be contrary to Objective FRM 01 which is that development that would cause flooding or exacerbate such a risk at the proposed development site or at another location shall not normally be permitted
Official decision evidence