Refusal decisions · 24–30 Aug 2026

81Refusals
79Substantive reasons
0Verification only
0Document not published
0Portal unavailable
2Manual review

49 of these refusals have page-cited grounds from a checked review. Browse the decision-date inventory.

What this means

Applications were most often refused because the proposal did not fit its site or surroundings, conflicted with zoning or rural-housing policy, lacked enough technical evidence to demonstrate its impacts were acceptable, harmed the amenity of neighbouring homes or created access or road-safety problems.

79 of 81 records carry official reason text

163 published statements, 2.1 per analysed application

43 refused on more than one ground, up to 6

Most common pairs

  1. 32 Design + Zoning/policy
  2. 30 Design + Residential amenity
  3. 27 Design + Missing evidence

All ten refusal themes

Applications · statements
  1. 01 Design, scale, character or visual impact 57
  2. 02 Zoning, land use, settlement policy or rural housing need 38
  3. 03 Missing or insufficient evidence, surveys or technical detail 32
  4. 04 Residential amenity, privacy, light or noise 32
  5. 05 Traffic, access, parking or road safety 31
  6. 06 Wastewater, effluent, groundwater or public health 19
  7. 07 Unauthorised development, retention or procedural history 19
  8. 08 Ecology, habitats or Natura impacts 14
  9. 09 Surface-water drainage or flood risk 14
  10. 10 Built heritage or archaeology 9

Refusal decisions · 24–30 Aug 2026

7 of 7 cards shown · 79 case links · 0 linked projects

Refused

Ballynakill (ed Ballymore), Ballymore, Wexford

Ballynakill (ed Ballymore), Ballymore

Wexford County Council · 20260908W

What was proposed

Permission to erect a dwelling house with services and domestic garage

Refusal reasons
  1. It is the policy of the Council, as set out in Volume 1, Chapter 4.9.3 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028, to ensure that a proposed development 'would not result in or extend an existing pattern of one-off linear development' and 'to strictly control individual rural housing in the open countryside in areas that are reaching their carrying capacity'. The proposed development would constitute ribbon development being the sixth dwelling within 250 metres thereby exacerbating a suburban form of linear development within a rural area. The proposed development, taken in conjunction with existing and permitted development, would constitute an undesirable exacerbation of ribbon development in a rural area, which would further detract from the amenities and further erode the rural character of the area. The proposed development is therefore considered contrary to Volume 1, Section 4.9.3 and Objective SH40 and SH43 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028 and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  2. The proposed development includes the removal of a circa 40m stretch of mature hedgerows and trees along the roadside hedgerow to provide sightlines. This constitutes the removal of the full roadside boundary of the subject site. The extent of hedgerow removal is unacceptable to the Planning Authority and would further erode the rural character and visual amenity of this area. The proposed development is considered to be contrary to Section 2.9.1 of Volume 2 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028 and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  3. Inadequate information has been submitted with regard to the proposed effluent treatment details and whether there would be adequate separation distance in accordance with the requirements of the EPA Code of Practice 2021: Domestic Waste Water Treatment Systems and therefore the proposal may pose a public health hazard.
Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Shelmaliere Commons (ed Forth), Forth, Wexford

Shelmaliere Commons (ed Forth), Forth

Wexford County Council · 20260906

What was proposed

Permission for the erection of a dwelling house, domestic garage/ store and

Refusal reasons
  1. Having regard to the highly elevated characteristics of the site and the characteristics of the development proposed, the proposed development would be unduly visually obtrusive in the Forth Mountain Distinctive Landscape as designated in the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028. As such the proposed development would be contrary to Objectives L06 and L14 of Volume 1 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028 and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  2. Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the development would not have adverse impacts on the Forth Mountain proposed Natural Heritage Area. As such the proposed development would be contrary to Objectives NH01 and NH04 of Volume 1 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028 and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  3. It has not been demonstrated that adequate sightlines can be achieved at the junction of the lane giving access to the site and the public road as the written consent of the relevant landowner (Wexford County Council) has not been given to the proposed works to the frontage of the adjoining property to the west. As such the proposed development would endanger public safety by reason of traffic hazard and would be contrary to Section 6.2.6 of Volume 2 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028 and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Camolin, Kilcomb, Wexford

Camolin, Kilcomb

Wexford County Council · 20260881W

What was proposed

Permission to demolish existing farm buildings and permission to erect 2 no.

Refusal reason

Having regard to the information submitted with the planning application, the Planning Authority is not satisfied that the proposed wastewater treatment systems and percolation areas can adequately treat and dispose of wastewater in line with the requirements of the EPA Code of Practice for Domestic Waste-Water Treatment Systems, 2001 and Section 8.31 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028. As set out in Section 8.31 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028, the minimum site size for one dwelling relying on a waste-water treatment system is 0.2ha. The current application seeks to introduce two dwellings on a site size of 0.24ha. The site assessment submitted with the application is also incomplete. The applicant has therefore failed to prove that the site is capable of safely disposing of the effluent generated by the proposed development meaning that the development may give rise to a public health and safety hazard. The proposed development would therefore be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Templetown, Templetown, Wexford

Templetown, Templetown

Wexford County Council · 20260879W

What was proposed

Permission for a change of house type from that previously granted under

Refusal reason

The siting of the proposed development within a sensitive landscape designated as being a coastal hook peninsula landscape would result in incongruous development that would be visually prominent and would not be easily absorbed by the surrounding landscape. The proposed development would likely result in a significant and detrimental impact on the visual amenities and character of this rural area and would set an inappropriate and undesirable precedent for further development of this type within this sensitive rural landscape. The proposed development fails to have sufficient regard to the rural housing design and visual impact guidance as expressed by Section 3.1.1 and Section 3.1.2 of Volume 2 Development Management Manual, and Section 3.2 and Section 6.1 of Volume 7 Landscape Character, and would therefore be contrary to Objectives L04, L05, L06, L08 and of Volume 7 Landscape Character, Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028.

Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Doogans Warren, Rosslare, Wexford

Doogans Warren, Rosslare

Wexford County Council · 20260893W

What was proposed

Permisison for the development consisting of extension and amendments to the

Refusal reasons
  1. The application site is located within the designated Coastal Landscape in Volume 7 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028 and is therefore classed as highly sensitive. It is considered that the proposed height and design of the extension does not consider or take into account sufficiently the sensitive nature of the site. The proposed development would likely result in a significant and detrimental impact on the visual amenities and character of this coastal area and would set an inappropriate and undesirable precedent for further development of this scale within the coastal landscape and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  2. Insufficient information has been received regarding the suitability of the existing dwelling to accommodate the proposed extension and as such would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Doogans Warren, Rosslare, Wexford

Doogans Warren, Rosslare

Wexford County Council · 20260893

What was proposed

Permisison for the development consisting of extension and amendments to the

Refusal reasons
  1. The application site is located within the designated Coastal Landscape in Volume 7 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028 and is therefore classed as highly sensitive. It is considered that the proposed height and design of the extension does not consider or take into account sufficiently the sensitive nature of the site. The proposed development would likely result in a significant and detrimental impact on the visual amenities and character of this coastal area and would set an inappropriate and undesirable precedent for further development of this scale within the coastal landscape and to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  2. Insufficient information has been received regarding the suitability of the existing dwelling to accommodate the proposed extension and as such would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Danescastle, Bannow, Wexford

Danescastle, Bannow

Wexford County Council · 20260890W

What was proposed

Permission for retention of alterations and extensions to an approved dwelling

Refusal reasons
  1. Taking into account Volume 2, Section 3.4 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028 and the plans submitted with the application, it is considered that the two-storey rear extension does not comply with the policy due to its visual appearance, due to the design and height. The development is therefore contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  2. The height and design of the proposed development would also adversely impact on the future development potential of adjoining properties through overlooking of adjacent lands to the east. The proposed development would therefore seriously injure the amenities and depreciate the value of property in the vicinity contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet