Refusal decisions · 19–25 Oct 2026

60Refusals
47Substantive reasons
1Verification only
3Document not published
2Portal unavailable
7Manual review

What this means

Applications were most often refused because the proposal did not fit its site or surroundings, conflicted with zoning or rural-housing policy, harmed the amenity of neighbouring homes, created access or road-safety problems or lacked enough technical evidence to demonstrate its impacts were acceptable.

47 of 60 records carry official reason text

79 published statements, 1.7 per analysed application

19 refused on more than one ground, up to 7

Most common pairs

  1. 17 Design + Zoning/policy
  2. 14 Design + Residential amenity
  3. 10 Residential amenity + Zoning/policy

All ten refusal themes

Applications · statements
  1. 01 Design, scale, character or visual impact 31
  2. 02 Zoning, land use, settlement policy or rural housing need 20
  3. 03 Residential amenity, privacy, light or noise 18
  4. 04 Traffic, access, parking or road safety 17
  5. 05 Missing or insufficient evidence, surveys or technical detail 8
  6. 06 Unauthorised development, retention or procedural history 8
  7. 07 Wastewater, effluent, groundwater or public health 8
  8. 08 Built heritage or archaeology 8
  9. 09 Ecology, habitats or Natura impacts 4
  10. 10 Surface-water drainage or flood risk 3

Refusal decisions · 19–25 Oct 2026

3 of 3 cards shown · 48 case links · 0 linked projects

Refused

Arthurstown, Kill, Naas, Co. Kildare, Kildare

Arthurstown, Kill, Naas, Co. Kildare

Kildare County Council · 2660997

What was proposed

The development consists of the development as constructed including: • A self-storage facility consisting of single storey container units • Vehicular entrance • CCTV, lighting and information signage and solar panels. • Associated site works

Refusal reasons
  1. The proposed development, by reason of its nature, scale, operational use and its location on o un-zoned lands in a rural area, accessed from a local road with a substandard access rp arrangement, constitutes haphazard and sporadic development in a rural area which is contrary to the policies and objectives of the Kildare County Development Plan 2023-2029 (as varied) Pu pertaining to appropriate rural based enterprise, in particular Objective RD O1, Section 9.3 Rural Economy & Rural Enterprise and the criteria set out in table 9.1 of the Kildare County Development Plan 2023-2029 (as varied). Having regard to the foregoing, the proposed n development would set an undesirable precedent for developments of this type on un-zoned io lands, would be injurious to the rural amenity of this area and would therefore be contrary to ct the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. pe
  2. Having regard to the location of the site off the L2019 local road, and the lack of information submitted with the application regarding sightline details at the entrance to the site, it has not ns been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority that the development to be retained can be safely accessed. The intensification of activity at this location would generate -I additional traffic movements onto the L2019, increasing the potential for traffic conflict and creating an unacceptable risk to the safety of all road users. Consequently, the development to il be retained would constitute a traffic hazard, endanger public safety and would therefore, be nc contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. ou
  3. Objective IN O22 requires the implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) and other nature-based surface water drainage as an integral part of all new development C proposals. In the absence of nature-based surface water drainage details, the proposed development is contrary to Objective IN O22 and Objective IN O58 of the Kildare County y Development Plan 2023-2029 (as varied) and if granted would therefore be contrary to the nt proper planning and sustainable development of the area. ou C e ar ld Ki
Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Churchtown, Athy, Co. Kildare, Kildare

Churchtown, Athy, Co. Kildare

Kildare County Council · 26107

What was proposed

a new bungalow containing 3 bedrooms, kitchen/dining, utility, living room, bathroom on ground floor and bed 4 with study and family spaces in the attic. This application is also to include a new entrance from the public road and all ancillary site works, retention of a currently certified Envirocare drainage system, retention of the applicants mobile home on the site and its removal upon completion of construction of the proposed bungalow

Refusal reasons

Reasons under review. View the official case.

Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Moneycooly, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Kildare

Moneycooly, Maynooth, Co. Kildare

Kildare County Council · 2660977

What was proposed

planning permission to build a single storey dwelling and detached domestic garage to be accessed via the existing recessed entrance & driveway and for all associated site works including connecting to the mains foul sewer

Refusal reasons
  1. The proposed development, given its location c.30m south of the development boundary of the Maynooth and Environs Joint Local Area Plan 2025-2031, Maynooth being designated as a Key rp Town within the Dublin Metropolitan Area in the Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy, would Pu be contrary to the provisions of Policy HO P15 of the Kildare County Development Plan 2023-2029 (as varied), which seeks to preserve and protect the open character of transitional lands outside of settlement boundaries in order to prevent urban sprawl near towns, villages and settlements and n to maintain a clear demarcation and distinction between urban areas and the countryside. The tio proposed development, if permitted, would contravene policy HO P15 of the Kildare County ec Development Plan 2023-2029 (as varied), and would set an undesirable precedent for similar development in close proximity to the settlement boundary of Maynooth, a Key Town within the sp Metropolitan Area, and would therefore be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. In
  2. Objective IN O13 of the Kildare County Development Plan 2023-2029 (as varied) seeks to ensure l- that adequate wastewater services will be available to service development prior to the granting of i planning permission. On the basis of the proposal to discharge foul flows from the proposed nc development to the public sewer via a private foul sewer pumping station that is offsite and not in the ownership of the Applicant, it has not been satisfactorily demonstrated to the Planning Authority ou that adequate wastewater services are available to service the proposed development. To permit the proposed development would be contrary to objective IN O13 of the Kildare County C Development Plan 2023-2029 (as varied) and would be prejudicial to public health and would therefore be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. y nt ou C e ar ld Ki
Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet