Refusal decisions · 19–25 Oct 2026

60Refusals
47Substantive reasons
1Verification only
3Document not published
2Portal unavailable
7Manual review

What this means

Applications were most often refused because the proposal did not fit its site or surroundings, conflicted with zoning or rural-housing policy, harmed the amenity of neighbouring homes, created access or road-safety problems or lacked enough technical evidence to demonstrate its impacts were acceptable.

47 of 60 records carry official reason text

79 published statements, 1.7 per analysed application

19 refused on more than one ground, up to 7

Most common pairs

  1. 17 Design + Zoning/policy
  2. 14 Design + Residential amenity
  3. 10 Residential amenity + Zoning/policy

All ten refusal themes

Applications · statements
  1. 01 Design, scale, character or visual impact 31
  2. 02 Zoning, land use, settlement policy or rural housing need 20
  3. 03 Residential amenity, privacy, light or noise 18
  4. 04 Traffic, access, parking or road safety 17
  5. 05 Missing or insufficient evidence, surveys or technical detail 8
  6. 06 Unauthorised development, retention or procedural history 8
  7. 07 Wastewater, effluent, groundwater or public health 8
  8. 08 Built heritage or archaeology 8
  9. 09 Ecology, habitats or Natura impacts 4
  10. 10 Surface-water drainage or flood risk 3

Refusal decisions · 19–25 Oct 2026

2 of 2 cards shown · 48 case links · 0 linked projects

Refused

Philpotstown, Garlow Cross, Navan, Co. Meath, C15 P9R0, Meath

Philpotstown, Garlow Cross, Navan, Co. Meath, C15 P9R0

Meath County Council · 2661097

What was proposed

Retention Permission is being sought for the retention of change of use of existing building containing a playroom and gym space (previously granted under planning reference AA161058) to Domestic 1 Bedroom Apartment with home office, connection to existing waste water treatment system and all associated site works

Refusal reasons

Reasons under review. View the official case.

Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Summerhill Road and Mornington View, Trim, Co. Meath, Meath

Summerhill Road and Mornington View, Trim, Co. Meath

Meath County Council · 2660401

What was proposed

the development will consist of the construction of a pair of semi-detached one and a half storey dwellings, new entrances off Summerhill Road and Mornington View, connection to all public services and all associated site works. Significant further information/revised plans submitted on this application

Refusal reason

The site serves as a gateway to the centre of Trim. The proposed design is incongruous with the streetscape and surrounding residential properties and of insufficient architectural quality, particularly in this sensitive location adjacent to an Architectural Conservation Area. Therefore, it is considered that the proposed development, by virtue of its design at this location would negatively impact on the setting of the Trim Architectural Conservation Area (ACA) and would therefore contravene materially objective y! HER POL 20 of the Meath County Development Plan 2021-2027 which reads as follows; nl “HER POL 20 To require that all development proposals within or contiguous to an ACA be sympathetic O to the character of the area, that the design is appropriate in terms of height, scale, plot density, layout, s materials and finishes and are appropriately sited and designed with regard to the advice given in the se Statements of Character for each area, where available”. po The proposed development would therefore adversely affect an Architectural Conservation Area, set an undesirable precedent and be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. r Pu g in w ie -V il nc ou C y nt ou C th ea M

Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet