Latest refusal decisions.

86Refusals
82Case links
66Lead matches
19Counties

What this means

Applications were most often refused because the proposal did not fit its site or surroundings, harmed the amenity of neighbouring homes, conflicted with zoning or rural-housing policy, lacked enough technical evidence to demonstrate its impacts were acceptable or created access or road-safety problems.

66 of 86 records carry official reason text

130 published statements, 2.0 per analysed application

35 refused on more than one ground, up to 6

Most common pairs

  1. 29 Design + Residential amenity
  2. 25 Design + Zoning/policy
  3. 22 Design + Missing evidence

All ten refusal themes

Applications · statements
  1. 01 Design, scale, character or visual impact 50
  2. 02 Residential amenity, privacy, light or noise 34
  3. 03 Zoning, land use, settlement policy or rural housing need 32
  4. 04 Missing or insufficient evidence, surveys or technical detail 28
  5. 05 Traffic, access, parking or road safety 23
  6. 06 Unauthorised development, retention or procedural history 13
  7. 07 Wastewater, effluent, groundwater or public health 9
  8. 08 Ecology, habitats or Natura impacts 9
  9. 09 Surface-water drainage or flood risk 8
  10. 10 Built heritage or archaeology 6

Refusals published 3–9 Aug 2026

5 of 5 matching records shown

Refused

52 Coolraine Heights, Old Cratloe Road, Limerick, Limerick

52 Coolraine Heights, Old Cratloe Road, Limerick

Limerick City and County Council · 2660582

What was proposed

the removal of the front boundary wall to facilitate a widened entrance and extended hard surfaced front driveway and planning permission to lower the kerb of an 11ft section of footpath to facilitate improved vehicular access and egress to an existing dwelling

Refusal reason

The proposal, by means of the excessive amount of hardstanding in the front garden area and excessive width of the vehicular entrance, would detract from the character and appearance of the host property and the suburban area. The proposal is visually obtrusive in the street scene and is considered to be contrary to section 11.8.5 Parking in Front Gardens of the Limerick Development Plan (2022 -2028) and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official decision evidence
Refused

Garbally, Kilmeedy, Co. Limerick, Limerick

Garbally, Kilmeedy, Co. Limerick

Limerick City and County Council · 267043

What was proposed

a dwelling house, garage, effluent treatment system, soil polishing filter, a new entrance and all associated site works. Original Planning Ref. No. 21/521

Refusal reason

The permission has not commenced therefore it is considered that the extension of duration does not comply with the requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i) (I) and (II) of the Planning and Development Act, 2000, (as amended).

Official decision evidence
Refused

Killeenoghty, Croom, Co. Limerick., Limerick

Killeenoghty, Croom, Co. Limerick.

Limerick City and County Council · 2660411

What was proposed

the construction of a new dwelling house, detached garage, entrance, driveway, packaged wastewater treatment system with percolation area and all ancillary site works

Refusal reason

The site of the proposed development is located within the Area of Strong Urban Influence as defined in the Limerick Development Plan 2022-2028. Based on the absence of documentary evidence submitted with the application to demonstrate compliance with housing policy and specifically evidence of living in the local area for at least 10 years, it is considered that the applicant does not come within the scope of the housing need criteria as set out in Objective HO O20 Rural Areas under Strong Urban Influence of the Development Plan, and as such, the proposed development would materially contravene the objectives of the Limerick Development Plan 2022-2028 in relation to rural settlement and be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official decision evidence
Refused

Monaster South, Croom, Co. Limerick, Limerick

Monaster South, Croom, Co. Limerick

Limerick City and County Council · 2660576

What was proposed

a change of use from a storage shed to dog kennels and retain an enclosed dog run to include associated site works

Refusal reasons
  1. The proposed development, comprising the use of an existing garage structure as a kennel facility associated with a charitable animal rescue operation, would constitute a use that is separate and distinct, and not incidental or ancillary to the residential use of the dwellinghouse. The proposed use would therefore represent a material change of use of the structure. Furthermore, the development would be contrary to Condition No.3 of Planning Permission Ref. 22/1254 which restricts the use of the garage to purposes ancillary to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse. The proposed development would therefore contravene the existing planning permission and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  2. The proposed kennel use, by reason of the nature of the activity, and in the absence of mitigation measures, would generate noise, odour and general disturbance that would adversely affect the residential amenities of adjoining properties and the wider rural area. The Planning Authority is not satisfied that the site is suitable for the proposed use or that adequate measures have been demonstrated to prevent unacceptable impacts on the amenities of neighbouring residents. The proposal is therefore contrary to Objective HO O3 – Protection of Existing Residential Amenity of the Limerick Development Plan 2022-2028 and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  3. The Camogue River is adjacent to the site and is a potential pathway to the Lower River Shannon Special Area of Conservation (site code 002165). As no details are included in relation to effluent management on site and a potential pathway has been identified, the Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that the proposed development individually or in combination with other plans or projects, would not result in adverse effects on the integrity of the Lower River Shannon SAC in view of the sites conservation objectives. The development would, therefore, be contrary to Objective EH O1 Designated Sites and Habitats Directive and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official decision evidence
Refused

Raheen, Ballyneety, Co. Limerick, Limerick

Raheen, Ballyneety, Co. Limerick

Limerick City and County Council · 2660568

What was proposed

the refurbishment of the existing derelict farmhouse as a family flat, the restoration of two existing agricultural sheds, the demolition of an existing agricultural shed, the construction of a part two storey, part single storey house, the construction of a stable block, wastewater treatment system, percolation area, alterations to existing entrance, a new entrance and all ancillary site works

Refusal reasons
  1. Having regard to the site assessment and characteristics of the site, the evident highwater table and poor percolation qualities of the soil, the Planning Authority considers there is a risk of ponding and surface and ground water pollution. Therefore, and having regard to Objective IN O11, Private Waste Water Treatment of the Limerick Development Plan, in relation to the EPA Code of Practice for Domestic Waste Water Treatment Systems 2021; it is considered that the proposals would be prejudicial to public health because the site is considered unsuitable for the effective treatment and disposal of domestic effluent.
  2. The proposal relates to a new build dwelling in the countryside. The site of the proposed development is located within the Area of Strong Urban Influence as defined in the Limerick Development Plan 2022 -2028. Insufficient information has been submitted, and it is considered that the applicant has not demonstrated compliance with the criteria as set out in Objective HO O20, Rural Areas under Strong Urban Influence of the Development Plan and as such, the proposed development would materially contravene the objectives of the Limerick Development Plan 2022 -2028 in relation to rural settlement, militate against the preservation of the rural environment and be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  3. The development is contrary to Objective HO O11, Subdivision of Dwelling to Accommodate Dependent Relative of the Limerick Development Plan 2022 -2028 which requires additional accommodation for older people by way of an extension attached to the main dwellings and outlines there will be a presumption against detached residential structures in all settings. Therefore, this proposal is considered contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area as it is effectively detached.
Official decision evidence