The 10 August council request leaves the warehouse-to-garage proposal at further-information stage. The June site plan needs coordinated bus-corridor, air-quality and signage responses before an outcome is established.
Existing warehouses are reconfigured for garage use
June proposal subject to the August information request
What the evidence says
The proposal reduces Building 1 from 1,021 to 928 m² and increases Building 2 from 726 to 837 m², alongside a 137 m² carwash/valet building and a 20 m² inspection pod. Drawing 101 P6 distinguishes existing buildings from the extension. The 10 August letter requests further information; it does not grant the conversion.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Garage fit-out, steelwork and service suppliers can separate conversion and demolition from new ancillary work.
What is not established
Permission, commencement, installed workshop equipment and supplier appointments are not established. These areas do not replace the retained project headline.
Inspect the evidence
Signed request for additional information · p.1
Development description; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION · Issued 2026-08-10 · Decision Order 0904; signed 10 August 2026; not a grant · Checked 2026-09-07
Development description; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Proposed garage site plan · p.1
AREAS; DRAWING KEY; Proposed Site Plan 101 P6 · Issued 2026-06-02 · Job 6576 drawing 101 revision P6; planning issue 2 June 2026; received 15 June; base date August 2025 · Checked 2026-09-07
AREAS; DRAWING KEY; Proposed Site Plan 101 P6
Combined solvent emissions need further evidence
Outstanding air-quality request dated 10 August
What the evidence says
FI item 1 says the assessment reports individual volatile organic compounds below the relevant guidelines, but still requires confirmation that combined VOC output from the proposed operations accords with air-quality guidelines.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Air-quality specialists and extraction designers need to assess the combined operation before treating the submitted plant arrangement as settled.
What is not established
A satisfactory response, accepted emissions design and installed extraction performance were not reviewed.
Inspect the evidence
Signed request for additional information · p.1
1. Supporting Assessments; combined VOCs output · Issued 2026-08-10 · Decision Order 0904; signed 10 August 2026; not a grant · Checked 2026-09-07
1. Supporting Assessments; combined VOCs output
The garage layout must accommodate the bus-corridor scheme
Road and service coordination still required after submitted revision P6
What the evidence says
The June plan hatches permanent and temporary NTA acquisition land along Nangor Road. FI item 2 requires updated drawings removing potential conflicts with the Tallaght/Clondalkin to City Centre Core Bus Corridor, supporting NTA coordination, and details of levels, tie-ins, construction traffic, utilities and surface/foul-water connections. It also requests 2.0 m by 45 m entrance visibility splays in both directions.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Roads and civil teams need the coordinated northern boundary and utility interface before fixing the siteworks design.
What is not established
NTA acceptance, a revised coordinated drawing and council approval are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Proposed garage site plan · p.1
Land permanently acquired; Land temporarily acquired; Nangor Road · Issued 2026-06-02 · Job 6576 drawing 101 revision P6; planning issue 2 June 2026; received 15 June; base date August 2025 · Checked 2026-09-07
Land permanently acquired; Land temporarily acquired; Nangor Road
Signed request for additional information · p.2
2. Site Layout (a)-(c) · Issued 2026-08-10 · Decision Order 0904; signed 10 August 2026; not a grant · Checked 2026-09-07
2. Site Layout (a)-(c)
Seven southern-elevation signs require a reduced proposal
Signage revision requested before the application can be decided
What the evidence says
FI item 3 says the seven signs proposed on Building 1 south elevation exceed the two-sign guideline for a single elevation. It requires revised proposals addressing sign numbers, material, dimensions and lighting.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Sign and facade suppliers should obtain the revised agreed design before manufacture.
What is not established
An accepted sign count, lighting specification and final permission were not reviewed.
Inspect the evidence
Signed request for additional information · p.2
3. Signage · Issued 2026-08-10 · Decision Order 0904; signed 10 August 2026; not a grant · Checked 2026-09-07
3. Signage
The declared pages of these government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Other catalogue files, later compliance, procurement and installed specifications were not established. Historical weekly membership is retained separately from these document dates.