The August notification decides to grant the described 88-home proposal; it expressly is not a final grant. The revised June layout’s schedule states 86 homes. The count discrepancy remains unresolved and selected public quantities are unchanged. Network upgrades, EV ducting revisions and other conditions still apply.
Decision describes 88 homes; the revised drawing’s 86-home schedule needs reconciliation
Decision-stage proposal; unresolved documentary quantity discrepancy
What the evidence says
The 7 August decision notification describes 88 homes and explicitly says it is not a final grant. Condition 1 incorporates revised submissions of 18 June and 17 July. The inspected June revision E site layout has a schedule stating 86 homes while its numbered layout reaches 88. These figures are not reconciled by the reviewed pages, so the drawing is not used to replace the retained headline quantity.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Planning and delivery teams should reconcile the agreed accommodation schedule before treating either the drawing schedule or notification description as a fully reconciled construction total.
What is not established
A final grant, explanation of the 86-versus-88 discrepancy and commencement of this exact case are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Notification of decision and twenty conditions · p.1
Notification describes 88 homes and says it is not a grant of permission · Issued 2026-08-07 · Decision notification dated 7 August 2026; expressly not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-07
Notification describes 88 homes and says it is not a grant of permission
Notification of decision and twenty conditions · p.4
Condition 1 incorporates 18 June and 17 July revised submissions · Issued 2026-08-07 · Decision notification dated 7 August 2026; expressly not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-07
Condition 1 incorporates 18 June and 17 July revised submissions
Further-information site layout · p.1
Revision E schedule states 86 total units; numbered plot list reaches 88 · Issued June 2026 (month only) · 25040-300-E, June 2026 revision E; original title date 11 December 2025; received 18 June 2026 · Checked 2026-09-07
Revision E schedule states 86 total units; numbered plot list reaches 88
Occupation and connections must wait for Uisce Eireann upgrades
Condition attached to the decision notification; network completion not established
What the evidence says
Condition 5 requires a connection agreement before works commence and prohibits connections or occupation until Uisce Eireann upgrade works are complete. Existing water infrastructure on the site requires written confirmation of feasible diversions or compliant separation/protection before works. The June layout marks the wayleave over the existing sewer.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Civil contractors and programme managers need to align delivery with the network-upgrade and existing-asset protection requirements.
What is not established
A signed agreement, completed network upgrades and written diversion/separation confirmation are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Notification of decision and twenty conditions · p.5
Condition 5(c)–(f): agreement, upgrade before occupation and existing infrastructure protection · Issued 2026-08-07 · Decision notification dated 7 August 2026; expressly not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-07
Condition 5(c)–(f): agreement, upgrade before occupation and existing infrastructure protection
Further-information site layout · p.1
Wayleave over existing sewer through the site · Issued June 2026 (month only) · 25040-300-E, June 2026 revision E; original title date 11 December 2025; received 18 June 2026 · Checked 2026-09-07
Wayleave over existing sewer through the site
June drainage layout combines bioretention, permeable paving and restricted outflow
Submitted FI drainage design, read with the later decision conditions
What the evidence says
The June PL02 drainage drawing shows bioretention basins, swales/filter drains and permeable paving. Its outlet annotation limits discharge to 7.5 litres per second and the detention-basin schedule gives a maximum attenuated 100-year-event water volume of 402 cubic metres. Condition 6 requires regulated discharge to the public surface-water network while protecting existing land and road drainage.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Drainage, landscape and paving teams must coordinate levels, flow controls and the available attenuation space rather than treating these as separate packages.
What is not established
Installed storage, final hydraulic acceptance, construction drawings and a final grant are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Further-information SuDS and surface-water drainage layout · p.1
PL02: bioretention, permeable paving, 7.5 l/s outlet and 402 m3 attenuated-event volume · Issued 2026-06-15 · 25087-DR-0202 revision PL02; received 18 June 2026 · Checked 2026-09-07
PL02: bioretention, permeable paving, 7.5 l/s outlet and 402 m3 attenuated-event volume
Notification of decision and twenty conditions · p.5
Condition 6: regulate public-network discharge and protect existing drainage · Issued 2026-08-07 · Decision notification dated 7 August 2026; expressly not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-07
Condition 6: regulate public-network discharge and protect existing drainage
EV ducting must be revised to preserve a clear 1.8-metre footpath
Council-required pre-commencement design revision
What the evidence says
Condition 8 requires an agreed public-lighting design and a revised EV ducting layout before commencement. Ducting must run along the front of the path, with charging equipment positioned so that at least 1.8 metres of footpath remains clear. The condition therefore requires a coordinated electrical and pedestrian-layout revision before installation.
Why it may matter — interpretation
Electrical and civil teams should agree charger position and duct routes together to avoid obstructing the pedestrian route.
What is not established
An approved revised layout, charger numbers/ratings and installed lighting or charging equipment are not established.
Inspect the evidence
Notification of decision and twenty conditions · p.6
Condition 8(d)–(e): agreed lighting and revised front-of-path EV ducting; 1.8 m clear width · Issued 2026-08-07 · Decision notification dated 7 August 2026; expressly not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-07
Condition 8(d)–(e): agreed lighting and revised front-of-path EV ducting; 1.8 m clear width
The declared pages of these government-published PDFs were visually inspected. Other catalogue files, later compliance, procurement and installed specifications were not established. Historical weekly membership is retained separately from these document dates.