Cavan County Council · 2660289 · Cavan
Latest linked evidence
2660289
Current planning index: New Application. Read the linked decisions for their full terms.
This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.
Reviewed build intelligence
Government document review
Council decision dated 21 July 2026 with 13 conditions, explicitly not a final grant. The report is the final planning version issued on 19 May 2026 and received on 27 May. The selected records do not establish construction or later licensing compliance.
2 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-05 · Official file index
Proposed in application · Exact wastewater-plant upgrade proposal under application 2660289
What the evidence says
The planning report proposes increasing Kingscourt wastewater treatment design capacity from 2,400 to 5,700 population equivalent over a 25-year design horizon. This is wastewater design loading, not a housing-unit count or a measured current population.
Exact wastewater-plant upgrade proposal under application 2660289
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: establishes the scale of the process upgrade using its own engineering measure.
What is not established
Commissioned treatment performance, a final grant and additional homes served are not established.
Kingscourt wastewater upgrade: planning report · p.11
from 2,400 p.e. to 5,700 p.e. (25-year design horizon) · Issued 2026-05-19 · Final Version for Planning; control table distinguishes earlier review drafts; received 2026-05-27 · Checked 2026-09-05
from 2,400 p.e. to 5,700 p.e. (25-year design horizon)
Proposed in application · Plant-process and primary-discharge infrastructure in the May planning design
What the evidence says
The report includes replacement inlet works, biological reactors, clarifiers, chemical dosing and sludge treatment. It also proposes an outfall pumping station and approximately three kilometres of new primary-discharge pipe to the River Lagan. Existing structures not required for the future process would be demolished.
Plant-process and primary-discharge infrastructure in the May planning design
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: distinguishes treatment equipment, decommissioning and the off-site outfall work.
What is not established
A supplier award, selected pump model, installed pipework and completed treatment plant are not established.
Kingscourt wastewater upgrade: planning report · p.11
new Primary Discharge Outfall pipe from the WwTP (ca. 3km) · Issued 2026-05-19 · Final Version for Planning; control table distinguishes earlier review drafts; received 2026-05-27 · Checked 2026-09-05
new Primary Discharge Outfall pipe from the WwTP (ca. 3km)
Proposed in application · Odour-control package within the proposed wastewater treatment upgrade
What the evidence says
The report describes an odour-control unit comprising high-density polyethylene carbon-filter units with associated above-ground ductwork. This is a proposed equipment material and treatment approach, without a named product or supplier.
Odour-control package within the proposed wastewater treatment upgrade
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: makes the selected treatment approach visible without inferring a manufacturer.
What is not established
Final detailed sizing, manufacturer, purchase and installed performance are not established.
Kingscourt wastewater upgrade: planning report · p.11
High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) carbon filter units · Issued 2026-05-19 · Final Version for Planning; control table distinguishes earlier review drafts; received 2026-05-27 · Checked 2026-09-05
High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) carbon filter units
Proposed in application · May planning report: three specified roofs within the wastewater plant
What the evidence says
The report allocates 24 panels to the welfare building, 60 to the sludge-dewatering building and 10 to the MCC 1 kiosk. They are landscape-oriented and flush-mounted at the respective roof pitches of 22, 15 and 11 degrees. The total is 94 proposed panels, not an installed or procured array.
May planning report: three specified roofs within the wastewater plant
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: provides an exact allocation and mounting intent for the solar work.
What is not established
Panel model, rated electrical capacity, purchase, grid approval and installation are not established.
Kingscourt wastewater upgrade: planning report · p.19
a total of 94 No. solar panels · Issued 2026-05-19 · Final Version for Planning; control table distinguishes earlier review drafts; received 2026-05-27 · Checked 2026-09-05
a total of 94 No. solar panels
Proposed in application · Proposed access across the Cabra Stream; dimensions are design values
What the evidence says
The report places a replacement bridge roughly 11 metres east of the existing crossing. It describes two concrete abutments, precast beams and an in-situ concrete deck, with a nine-metre clear span and 1.7 metres clearance above normal stream level. The existing crossing would be removed.
Proposed access across the Cabra Stream; dimensions are design values
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: identifies the separate bridge structure needed for construction and maintenance access.
What is not established
Final bridge design approval, precast supplier, installed dimensions and completed works are not established.
Kingscourt wastewater upgrade: planning report · p.15
with precast bridge beams placed on the abutments · Issued 2026-05-19 · Final Version for Planning; control table distinguishes earlier review drafts; received 2026-05-27 · Checked 2026-09-05
with precast bridge beams placed on the abutments
Proposed in application · Proposed construction sequence within one treatment-plant upgrade; not observed progress
What the evidence says
The proposed initial phase relocates services and builds the substation, replacement access and pumped outfall. New southern process units and MCC 1 follow, then northern sludge and chemical facilities. The western demolition, new storm tank and administration building are described as the final sequence.
Proposed construction sequence within one treatment-plant upgrade; not observed progress
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: connects enabling, process and demolition packages without presenting the plan as a live construction programme.
What is not established
Actual commencement dates, completed stages, appointments and a contractual programme are not established.
Kingscourt wastewater upgrade: planning report · p.15
Initially, re-routing of existing services will take place · Issued 2026-05-19 · Final Version for Planning; control table distinguishes earlier review drafts; received 2026-05-27 · Checked 2026-09-05
Initially, re-routing of existing services will take place
Council condition; later compliance not inspected · Condition 2 in the council decision of 21 July 2026
What the evidence says
Condition 2 requires an application for review of the wastewater discharge licence within six months of the final grant and before development starts, unless the EPA agrees otherwise in writing. The decision notice itself is explicitly not a grant of permission.
Condition 2 in the council decision of 21 July 2026
Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: records the document’s stated dependency before construction; it is not evidence that the licence review was completed.
What is not established
A later final grant, licence-review submission, EPA agreement and actual start are not established.
Kingscourt wastewater upgrade: council decision · p.2
THIS NOTICE IS NOT A GRANT OF PERMISSION · Issued 2026-07-21 · Decision with 13 conditions; not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-05
THIS NOTICE IS NOT A GRANT OF PERMISSION
Kingscourt wastewater upgrade: council decision · p.3
within six months of the date of the final grant of permission · Issued 2026-07-21 · Decision with 13 conditions; not a final grant · Checked 2026-09-05
within six months of the date of the final grant of permission
Selected pages of 2 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. The exact council index lists 64 document rows. Only cited pages of 2 selected government-published PDFs establish these findings; the remaining catalogue has not been reviewed. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.
Source history
2660289
Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.
Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.