Connected planning records

Planning case 2660120

Meath County Council · 2660120

Latest linked evidence

Planning appeal received · 2026-08-27

501989

Open official source

This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.

Reviewed build intelligence

What is being built

Government document review

The 83-home Phase 1D proposal received a conditional council decision on 4 August 2026 and is under Commission appeal 501989. Delivery of separately permitted infrastructure is a commencement prerequisite, not a fulfilled event. December 2025 design alternatives and May 2026 lighting revisions remain separately dated.

4 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-05 · Official file index

Phase 1D has explicit infrastructure prerequisites

Council condition; appeal pending · Meath 2660120, Athlumney Phase 1D; separate Phase 1B infrastructure is a prerequisite, not an added dwelling count

What the evidence says
The council order dated 4 August 2026 conditionally permits the 83-home Phase 1D proposal. Its conditions require delivery of the separate four-hectare open space and evidence that the 1.65-hectare district park, community centre/sports hall, childcare and neighbourhood centre under 24/60415 and Commission case 322341 are operational before the relevant commencement. Commission case 501989 is pending. These are delivery conditions, not evidence that those facilities exist.

Meath 2660120, Athlumney Phase 1D; separate Phase 1B infrastructure is a prerequisite, not an added dwelling count

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: identifies dependencies that can affect when this phase can proceed and prevents a permission date being presented as a construction start.

What is not established
No final appeal decision, fulfilled condition, construction start or additional scheme-wide dwelling total is established.

Inspect the evidence

Council executive order and conditions · p.1
83 no. residential dwellings · Issued 2026-08-04 · CEO 1281/26; conditional decision under appeal · Checked 2026-09-05

83 no. residential dwellings

Council executive order and conditions · p.3
1.65 hectares · Issued 2026-08-04 · CEO 1281/26; conditional decision under appeal · Checked 2026-09-05

1.65 hectares

The revised lighting has 32 fittings; the original schedule had 30

Revised design; council decision under appeal · Phase 1D and distributor-road revised public lighting; historical December 2025 specification retained for comparison

What the evidence says
The December 2025 report specifies 21 Metro R03 and nine Metro R01 19 W luminaires. The July 2026 planner assessment of further information instead describes 32 Veelite Metro Streetlight LED fittings at 19 W or 52 W and 3000 K, including the distributor-road revision. It records no lighting in the F1 open space or the northwestern open space. The council condition refers to the revised design received on 29 May 2026. The two counts belong to different versions and must not be added.

Phase 1D and distributor-road revised public lighting; historical December 2025 specification retained for comparison

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for lighting work: identifies a concrete version change and distinguishes lit road areas from intentionally unlit open space.

What is not established
No purchase, installation, as-built count or later appeal-approved lighting schedule is established.

Inspect the evidence

Planner assessment of further information · p.17
32 Veelite Metro Streetlight · Issued 2026-07-28 · Report dated 28 July 2026, considering the revised submission received 29 May 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05

32 Veelite Metro Streetlight

Planner assessment of further information · p.18
No public lighting · Issued 2026-07-28 · Report dated 28 July 2026, considering the revised submission received 29 May 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05

No public lighting

Original outdoor lighting report · p.5
21 x Metro Streetlight · Issued 2025-12-16 · P01; received 30 January 2026; superseded in part by the further-information design · Checked 2026-09-05

21 x Metro Streetlight

Council executive order and conditions · p.4
29/05/2026 · Issued 2026-08-04 · CEO 1281/26; conditional decision under appeal · Checked 2026-09-05

29/05/2026

The council specifies the shared-surface wearing course

Council condition; appeal pending · Council-conditioned shared surfaces within Phase 1D; decision under appeal

What the evidence says
The council condition specifies a 35 mm layer of buff or beige, 10 mm SMA 10 surf with colour-matched aggregate in proposed shared-surface areas, unless otherwise agreed. It does not apply that finish to every road or establish a measured quantity.

Council-conditioned shared surfaces within Phase 1D; decision under appeal

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for surfacing trades: gives a specific layer and finish while retaining the condition allowing a later agreed change.

What is not established
Area, tonnage, manufacturer, agreed substitution and installed surface are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Council executive order and conditions · p.5
35mm layer · Issued 2026-08-04 · CEO 1281/26; conditional decision under appeal · Checked 2026-09-05

35mm layer

Drainage and compensatory storage still require agreement

Council condition; appeal pending · Phase 1D flood and surface-water conditions; no quantity or tank specification inferred

What the evidence says
The council conditions require a ten-metre riparian strip and agreement of proposed levels, compensatory storage, and the revised attenuation and sustainable-drainage design before construction. These are outstanding design and agreement requirements rather than a fully approved construction detail or evidence of installed storage.

Phase 1D flood and surface-water conditions; no quantity or tank specification inferred

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for drainage and civil engineering: identifies work that needs a coordinated agreed design before a construction specification can be relied on.

What is not established
Final storage volume, discharge arrangement, proprietary system and completion of the agreements are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Council executive order and conditions · p.4
10m riparian strip · Issued 2026-08-04 · CEO 1281/26; conditional decision under appeal · Checked 2026-09-05

10m riparian strip

Council executive order and conditions · p.5
compensatory storage · Issued 2026-08-04 · CEO 1281/26; conditional decision under appeal · Checked 2026-09-05

compensatory storage

Heating, hot water and ventilation are not selected in the energy statement

Original energy design remains unselected · P02 energy statement for the original Phase 1D application, before the later further-information decision

What the evidence says
The December 2025 energy statement leaves the space-heating, hot-water and ventilation systems to the design team. It discusses photovoltaic panels or a heat pump as renewable options. This establishes design intent and alternatives, not a selected heat-pump product or equipment schedule.

P02 energy statement for the original Phase 1D application, before the later further-information decision

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for building services: shows that a later coordinated mechanical and electrical design is needed before treating equipment as specified.

What is not established
No selected manufacturer, model, capacity, unit count, procurement or installed heating system is established.

Inspect the evidence

Energy efficiency and climate-adaptation design statement · p.9
will be decided by the design team · Issued 2025-12-19 · P02; received 30 January 2026 · Checked 2026-09-05

will be decided by the design team
Remaining document questions
  • Which later official decision, approved detail or revision changes these source-specific findings?
  • Has a phase-specific official record established the selected equipment or installed specification?

Selected pages of 4 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. The council index contained 213 parsed document rows. Five PDFs were accessed; selected rendered pages of four support these findings. The remaining case documents have not been fully inspected. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.

Source history

Timeline

  1. Planning application received

    2660120

  2. Planning decision

    2660120

    Conditional permission

  3. Planning appeal received

    501989

    Official source

What this record establishes

Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.

Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.