Connected planning records

Energy, Ballyoughtragh South Commons, Farranmanagh Knocknaman and... - Planning Application 2560856

Kerry County Council · 2560856 · Kerry

Latest linked evidence

Planning appeal received · 2026-08-26

501954

Open official source

Current planning index: Appeal. Read the linked decisions for their full terms.

This page connects records for one planning case. Separate permissions, amendments and phases may belong to a wider development. A notified commencement date does not confirm that building work started.

Reviewed build intelligence

What is being built

Government document review

The council notification dated 11 August 2026 conditionally decides to grant the application. Commission appeal 501954, lodged 26 August 2026, remains pending. The originalSeptember 2025 technical report and later 2026 drainage responses are kept separate; no overallMW/MWh capacity or construction start is inferred.

3 official documents inspected · Checked 2026-09-05 · Official file index

The decision identifies the storage modules and a distinct grid route

Council decision under appeal · Kerry 2560856; distinguish solar equipment, storage equipment and the grid connection

What the evidence says
The council notification dated 11 August 2026 describes 36 energy-storage modules with nine transformers and two auxiliary transformers, alongside the solar farm and its separate 14 transformer stations. It identifies approximately 3.87 km of 38 kV underground connection to Oughtragh 110 kV substation. This is a conditional council decision under appeal, not a completed installation.

Kerry 2560856; distinguish solar equipment, storage equipment and the grid connection

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation: preserves the separate equipment groups and electrical scopes without adding unlike quantities.

What is not established
No final appeal decision, installed equipment, purchased models or reconciled overall generation/storage capacity is established.

Inspect the evidence

Council notification of decision and conditions · p.1
36 no. containerized energy storage modules · Issued 2026-08-11 · Ten-year planning permission and forty-year operational term; decision under appeal · Checked 2026-09-05

36 no. containerized energy storage modules

The original design uses driven galvanised steel posts and string inverters

Original technical proposal before further information · Original solar-array and inverter design before later further-information submissions

What the evidence says
The September 2025 fire assessment describes solar frames fixed to driven galvanised steel posts, tilted between 10 and 25 degrees. It proposes string inverters at array ends and underground AC cabling to transformer kiosks. These are source-specific planning details from the original submission.

Original solar-array and inverter design before later further-information submissions

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for solar and electrical construction: identifies mounting and distribution work without treating a generic description as a selected product.

What is not established
No final pile design, inverter brand, measured cable length, installed specification or later coordinated equipment schedule is established.

Inspect the evidence

Solar farm and storage fire-safety assessment · p.7
galvanised steel posts · Issued 2025-09-18 · Revision 0; received 22 September 2025; original planning submission · Checked 2026-09-05

galvanised steel posts

Solar farm and storage fire-safety assessment · p.8
string inverters · Issued 2025-09-18 · Revision 0; received 22 September 2025; original planning submission · Checked 2026-09-05

string inverters

The battery table presents alternatives, not one selected duty

Original alternatives; final selection not established · Two options in the September 2025 energy-storage assessment; not a final procurement schedule

What the evidence says
The original assessment describes 36 modular storage containers and shows two lithium-iron-phosphate configurations: a four-hour option at 1,200 kW and a two-hour option at 2,350 kW. Both table columns state 5,016 kWh nameplate capacity and liquid cooling. It does not select one duty or prove that multiplying a table value by the planned module count gives the final project capacity.

Two options in the September 2025 energy-storage assessment; not a final procurement schedule

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for storage and grid equipment: supplies concrete source parameters while keeping the configuration choice unresolved.

What is not established
No chosen option, manufacturer, usable site-wide capacity, final project MW/MWh, procurement or installation is established.

Inspect the evidence

Solar farm and storage fire-safety assessment · p.9
36 no. modular containers · Issued 2025-09-18 · Revision 0; received 22 September 2025; original planning submission · Checked 2026-09-05

36 no. modular containers

Solar farm and storage fire-safety assessment · p.10
5016 kWh · Issued 2025-09-18 · Revision 0; received 22 September 2025; original planning submission · Checked 2026-09-05

5016 kWh

Battery protection features remain supplier-dependent

Original alternatives; final selection not established · Typical features described in the original energy-storage fire assessment

What the evidence says
The report explicitly says storage safety features vary by supplier. It lists battery management, smoke and heat detection, combustible-gas detection, active ventilation and separate alarm/backup-power arrangements as typical protection features. That list is not a verified final installed safety system or a compliance certification.

Typical features described in the original energy-storage fire assessment

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for fire and controls work: identifies systems that need to be checked against the eventual chosen equipment and agreed design.

What is not established
Selected detector types, safety-system design, product certification and installed protection are not established.

Inspect the evidence

Solar farm and storage fire-safety assessment · p.12
vary between suppliers · Issued 2025-09-18 · Revision 0; received 22 September 2025; original planning submission · Checked 2026-09-05

vary between suppliers

Further information adds stone drains, trench soakaways and an oil separator

Further-information response; council decision under appeal · Further-information drainage response for the array areas and substation; separate catchments

What the evidence says
The later planner assessment records revised stone land drains and large trench soakaways at middle and lower boundaries of the array areas. It also describes substation runoff passing through a bypass oil separator before a dedicated soakaway. These are the submitted drainage responses assessed at council stage.

Further-information drainage response for the array areas and substation; separate catchments

Why it may matter — interpretation
Interpretation for civil and drainage work: identifies the component types and their distinct locations without inventing sizes or volumes.

What is not established
No pipe schedule, soakaway capacity, separator model, final construction drawings or completed drainage installation is established.

Inspect the evidence

Planner assessment of further information · p.2
bypass oil separator · Issued 2026-08-10 · Signed 10 August 2026; assesses 2026 further-information responses · Checked 2026-09-05

bypass oil separator
Remaining document questions
  • Which later official decision, approved detail or revision changes these source-specific findings?
  • Has a phase-specific official record established the selected equipment or installed specification?

Selected pages of 3 government-published PDFs were visually inspected. The council index contains 262 parsed document rows. Three PDFs were accessed and selected rendered pages of those three support these findings. The remaining catalogue and later equipment drawings have not been fully inspected. Proposals do not establish procurement or installed work.

Source history

Timeline

  1. Planning application received

    2560856

  2. Planning decision

    2560856

    Conditional permission

  3. Planning appeal received

    501954

    Official source

What this record establishes

Only exact linked records appear here. A missing appeal, commencement or completion entry means that evidence has not been established on this page. It does not prove that the event never happened.

Planning scale and individual notice or phase quantities remain separate. Notice quantities are not added into a development total or completion percentage.