Refusal decisions · 10–16 Aug 2026

62Refusals
61Substantive reasons
0Verification only
0Document not published
0Portal unavailable
1Manual review

57 of these refusals have page-cited grounds from a checked review. Browse the decision-date inventory.

What this means

Applications were most often refused because the proposal did not fit its site or surroundings, created access or road-safety problems, conflicted with zoning or rural-housing policy, lacked enough technical evidence to demonstrate its impacts were acceptable or harmed the amenity of neighbouring homes.

61 of 62 records carry official reason text

131 published statements, 2.1 per analysed application

32 refused on more than one ground, up to 8

Most common pairs

  1. 21 Design + Transport/access
  2. 20 Design + Zoning/policy
  3. 17 Design + Residential amenity

All ten refusal themes

Applications · statements
  1. 01 Design, scale, character or visual impact 44
  2. 02 Traffic, access, parking or road safety 25
  3. 03 Zoning, land use, settlement policy or rural housing need 25
  4. 04 Missing or insufficient evidence, surveys or technical detail 20
  5. 05 Residential amenity, privacy, light or noise 20
  6. 06 Surface-water drainage or flood risk 14
  7. 07 Unauthorised development, retention or procedural history 14
  8. 08 Ecology, habitats or Natura impacts 14
  9. 09 Wastewater, effluent, groundwater or public health 10
  10. 10 Built heritage or archaeology 6

Refusal decisions · 10–16 Aug 2026

2 of 2 cards shown · 59 case links · 61 linked projects

Refused

Curraghchase North, Kilcornan, Co. Limerick., Limerick

Curraghchase North, Kilcornan, Co. Limerick.

Limerick City and County Council · 26152

What was proposed

a new dwelling house, detached garage, site entrance, wastewater treatment system, percolation area and all associated site works

Refusal reasons
  1. Taking account of the high/extreme groundwater vulnerability in the area, that the site is underlain by a regionally important aquifer and the number of existing houses in the area, additional loading from an onsite wastewater treatment system serving the proposed dwelling to the groundwater would increase the risk of groundwater contamination resulting in an unacceptable risk to public health, in particular for existing dwellings in the area currently served by individual bore wells. In addition, the River Greanagh 010 Water Body has been deemed to be under significant pressure from domestic wastewater treatment systems in the 2nd cycle in the Water Framework Directive. Therefore, the proposed development would be contrary to Objective EH 015 of the Limerick Development Plan 2022- 2028, to protect ground and surface water resources and to take into account the requirement of the Water Framework Directive when dealing with planning and land use issues, as well as Objective EH 016, to ensure that septic tanks/proprietary treatment systems, or other waste water treatment and storage systems which are required as part of a development, comply with the standards set out under EPA 2021 etc. and that they are constructed only where site conditions are appropriate. Accordingly, the proposed development would be contrary to the proper planning and development of the area.
  2. The proposed development would materially contravene the Section 47 Agreement attached to Planning Register Reference Number 10/299 sterilising the subject site and remainder of the landholding associated with 10/299 from further residential development.
  3. The site of the proposed development is located within the Area of Strong Urban Influence as defined in the Limerick Development Plan 2022-2028. Based on the documentary evidence submitted with the application, it is considered that the applicant does not come within the scope of the housing need criteria as set out in Objective HO 020 (Rural Areas under Strong Urban Influence) of the Development Plan, and as such, the proposed development would materially contravene the objectives of the Limerick Development Plan 2022-2028 in relation to rural settlement, militate against the preservation of the rural environment and be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  4. Having regard to the proximity of the development site to Curraghchase Woods Special Area of Conservation (Site Code: 000174), c. 100m distance, and the qualifying interests of the SAC, namely the Lesser Horseshoe Bat, the potential arises for direct and indirect effects during the construction phase of the proposed development. In this regard, in the absence of a bat survey, carried out by a suitably qualified ecologist with particular experience of the Lesser Horseshoe Bat, the Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that the proposed development individually or in combination with other plans or projects, would not result in adverse effects on the integrity of the Curraghchase Woods Special Area of Conservation (Site Code: 000174) in view of the conservation objectives and qualifying interests of same.
Notification of decision — refusal schedule, pages 3–4
Refused

24 Saint Joseph Street, Limerick, Limerick

24 Saint Joseph Street, Limerick

Limerick City and County Council · 2660673

What was proposed

construction of a flat roof dormer to the rear of the existing dwelling extending above the ridge to facilitate an attic conversion comprising a bedroom and bathroom and all ancillary site works

Refusal reason

The design for the attic conversion/extension as presented is incongruous with the existing roof profile of the house in question and the adjoining dwelling. The extension would be harmful to the visual and residential amenity of the site and surrounding area due to its excessive size, bulk and poor design. The extension would therefore be contrary to Objective HO O3 Protection of Existing Residential Amenity and section 11.4.4.1.3 Alterations at Roof/Attic Level of the Limerick Development Plan 2022-2028 and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area

Official refusal decision — published grounds