Latest refusal decisions.

Partial count · 131 records as of this provisional edition.

131Refusals
131Case links
91Lead matches
24Counties

What this means

Applications were most often refused because the proposal did not fit its site or surroundings, created access or road-safety problems, lacked enough technical evidence to demonstrate its impacts were acceptable, conflicted with zoning or rural-housing policy or harmed the amenity of neighbouring homes.

91 of 131 records carry official reason text

198 published statements, 2.2 per analysed application

52 refused on more than one ground, up to 6

Most common pairs

  1. 31 Design + Transport/access
  2. 27 Design + Residential amenity
  3. 25 Design + Zoning/policy

All ten refusal themes

Applications · statements
  1. 01 Design, scale, character or visual impact 56
  2. 02 Traffic, access, parking or road safety 41
  3. 03 Missing or insufficient evidence, surveys or technical detail 38
  4. 04 Zoning, land use, settlement policy or rural housing need 38
  5. 05 Residential amenity, privacy, light or noise 32
  6. 06 Unauthorised development, retention or procedural history 25
  7. 07 Wastewater, effluent, groundwater or public health 24
  8. 08 Surface-water drainage or flood risk 17
  9. 09 Ecology, habitats or Natura impacts 15
  10. 10 Built heritage or archaeology 12

Refusals published 10–16 Aug 2026

4 of 4 matching records shown

Refused

Fihoragh, Moyne, Co Longford, Longford

Fihoragh, Moyne, Co Longford

Longford County Council · 2660120

What was proposed

the refurbishment of an existing dwelling, the construction of a single-storey extension, the upgrade of the domestic wastewater treatment system, and all ancillary site works

Refusal reason

Based on the information submitted the applicant has failed to demonstrate the availability and achievement of the required sightlines of 90m in both directions from the entrance. The proposed development would therefore result in the intensification of a substandard entrance and result in the creation of a serious traffic hazard by reason of the traffic movements generated at a location where visibility is restricted. The development would establish an undesirable future precedent and would therefore be co ntrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official decision evidence
Refused

The Bridge House, Athlone Road, Ballymahon, Longford

The Bridge House, Athlone Road, Ballymahon

Longford County Council · 2660195

What was proposed

and retention permission to complete the construction of a 70 square metre single storey house type dwelling, reconnection into the current on site mains sewerage connection & all ancillary site works

Refusal reasons
  1. The applicant has failed to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of Development Management Standard DMS16.80 of the Longford County Development Plan 2021-2027 and the ‘Sustainable Residential Development and Compact Settlements Guidelines for Planning Authorities’. The planning application lacks sufficient information to demonstrate that the proposed development would not have a serious impact on the residential amenity of the existing dwelling and any future residents of the proposed dwelling by reason of its siting and design. The development would therefore set an undesirable precedent within the area and is considered contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  2. The proposed development would result in inadequate off-street parking provision, with only two parking spaces provided to serve both the existing dwelling and the proposed dwelling, contrary to the parking standards contained within the Longford County Development Plan 2021-2027. Furthermore, the site fails to provide adequate turning space, resulting in vehicles reversing onto the N55 National Road. The Planning Authority considers that this would give rise to a traffic hazard and would be prejudicial to the safety and convenience of road users. The development would establish an undesirable future precedent and would therefore be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official decision evidence
Refused

Cleenrah, Aughnacliffe, Co. Longford, Longford

Cleenrah, Aughnacliffe, Co. Longford

Longford County Council · 2560268

What was proposed

(a) external cladding on garage building (b) permission to construct an extension to the rear of the existing garage building including minor internal and external alteration to same (c) construct an entrance porch to the front of the existing building (d) new entrance location and associated walls and piers (e) signage and (f) all ancillary site works

Refusal reason

The applicant has not sufficiently demonstrated that the proposed wastewater treatment system and percolation area can adequately manage the disposal of wastewater from the site in accordance with EPA Code of Practice, Domestic Wastewater Treatment Systems (Population Equivalent ≤ 10), 2021. In the absence of this information in order to properly assess the impact on the local environment, to permit the said development would be prejudicial to public health due to risk of pollution and would not be in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official decision evidence
Refused

Lissanurlan, Longford, Co. Longford, Longford

Lissanurlan, Longford, Co. Longford

Longford County Council · 2660187

What was proposed

to renovate and extend my existing dwelling to include in the renovation a new roof, bedroom and games room and in the extension a kitchen, dining, living room, utility, bathroom and hot press with 3 bedrooms, study and w.c. and to connect to the existing septic tank and percolation area with all ancillary site works

Refusal reasons
  1. The location of the entrance to the development is onto the N5, a national strategic route, at a location where the maximum speed limit applies. It is the policy of the Spatial Planning and National Roads: Guidelines for Planning Authorities (2012) (DOECLG) as reflected in Policy CPO 5.15 of the Longford County Development Plan 2021-2027 ‘to protect the capacity, efficiency and safety of the national road network in County Longford by complying with ‘Spatial Planning and National Roads – Guidelines for planning authorities’ (2012). The entrance, additional turning movements and intensification created by the proposed development would endanger public safety by reason of a traffic hazard and obstruction of road users and materially contravene Policy CPO 5.15 of the Longford County Development Plan 2021 – 2027.
  2. The applicant has not sufficiently demonstrated that the existing septic tank and percolation area can adequately manage the disposal of wastewater from the existing/proposed dwelling. In the absence of this information in order to properly assess the impact on the local environment, to permit the said development could be prejudicial to public health due to risk of pollution and would not be in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
  3. The Planning Authority is not satisfied, based on the information submitted with the planning application, that the proposed development, individually or in combination with other plans or projects, would not be likely to have a significant effect on a European site. In the absence of such information, the Planning Authority cannot conclude that the proposed development would not adversely affect the integrity of any European site. The proposed development is therefore contrary to CPO 12.62 of the Longford County Development Plan 2021 – 2027 and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Official decision evidence