Refusal decisions · 27 Jul–2 Aug 2026

69Refusals
69Substantive reasons
0Verification only
0Document not published
0Portal unavailable
0Manual review

9 of these refusals have page-cited grounds from a checked review. Browse the decision-date inventory.

What this means

Applications were most often refused because the proposal did not fit its site or surroundings, conflicted with zoning or rural-housing policy, created access or road-safety problems, harmed the amenity of neighbouring homes or lacked enough technical evidence to demonstrate its impacts were acceptable.

69 of 69 records carry official reason text

139 published statements, 2.0 per analysed application

34 refused on more than one ground, up to 6

Most common pairs

  1. 23 Design + Residential amenity
  2. 23 Design + Zoning/policy
  3. 21 Design + Transport/access

All ten refusal themes

Applications · statements
  1. 01 Design, scale, character or visual impact 41
  2. 02 Zoning, land use, settlement policy or rural housing need 33
  3. 03 Traffic, access, parking or road safety 30
  4. 04 Residential amenity, privacy, light or noise 27
  5. 05 Missing or insufficient evidence, surveys or technical detail 26
  6. 06 Unauthorised development, retention or procedural history 20
  7. 07 Wastewater, effluent, groundwater or public health 19
  8. 08 Surface-water drainage or flood risk 13
  9. 09 Ecology, habitats or Natura impacts 12
  10. 10 Built heritage or archaeology 7

Refusal decisions · 27 Jul–2 Aug 2026

3 of 3 cards shown · 66 case links · 0 linked projects

Refused

ENDRIM, FERBANE, CO. OFFALY, Offaly

ENDRIM, FERBANE, CO. OFFALY

Offaly County Council · EX26010

What was proposed

21347 FOR EXTENSION TO EXISTING SLATTED CATTLE HOUSE TO INCLUDE UNDERGROUND SLATTED SLURRY STORAGE, DRY BEDDED SHED FOR CATTLE HOUSING AND ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS

Refusal reason

Substantial development works have not commenced or completed before the expiration of the appropriate period. Therefore, an extension of duration would be contrary to section 42(1) (a)(i)(I) and (III) of the Planning and Development Act, 2000, as amended.

Chief Executive’s Order 687/26 — refusal schedule, page 2; filed under 21/347
Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Drumcooley, Edenderry, Co. Offaly, Offaly

Drumcooley, Edenderry, Co. Offaly

Offaly County Council · 2660303

What was proposed

a one storey house, effluent treatment system and polishing filter, recessed entrance and all associated siteworks

Refusal reason

The subject site is located in open countryside that is identified as ‘Rural Area Under Strong Urban Influence’ in the Offaly County Development Plan 2021- 2027. In such areas it is development plan policy that certain categories of applicant, which are defined in policy SSP -27 of the County Development Plan, will be given a positive presumption for the development of a permanent rural home. As the applicant (a) currently owns a house in the open countryside and (b) in the absence of sufficient supporting evidence that the applicant has a justifiable need to reside in this specific rural location, the Planning Authority considers that the applicant does not comply with policy SSP-27 of the Development Plan, and that the proposed development, if permitted, would materially contravene the Offaly County Development Plan 2021- 2027 and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official refusal decision — published grounds
Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Ballyheashill, Rhode, Co. Offaly, Offaly

Ballyheashill, Rhode, Co. Offaly

Offaly County Council · 2660300

What was proposed

A) Erection of single storey type house, (B) Garage / store for domestic use, (C) Installation of a proprietary wastewater treatment system with percolation area and (D) New vehicular recessed entrance and access driveway and all associated site works.

Refusal reason

The subject site is located in open countryside that is identified as ‘Rural Area Under Strong Urban Influence’ in the Offaly County Development Plan 2021- 2027. In such areas it is development plan policy that certain categories of applicant, which are defined in policy SSP -27 of the County Development Plan, will be given a positive presumption for the development of a permanent rural home. As the applicant (a) has previously owned a house in the open countryside and (b) In the absence of sufficient supporting evidence that the applicant has a justifiable need to reside in this specific rural location, the Planning Authority considers that the applicant does not comply with policy SSP -27 of the Development Plan, that the proposed development, if permitted, would materially contravene the Offaly County Development Plan 2021- 2027 and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official refusal decision — published grounds
Open official case Not linked yet