Refusal decisions · 28 Sep–4 Oct 2026

Reasons under review. View the official case.

Based on the details submitted with the planning application, it is considered that the retention of n amendments to the estate road layout previously approved under Planning Ref. 2560299 would io result in an area of public open space, which forms part of the development to be retained, which ct is not adequately over-looked and which is not considered to be usable open space due to the pe narrow width of the area, would result in a poor provision of public open space to serve the ns residential development and would thereby constitute a substandard form of development which would seriously injure the visual, residential and general amenities of the area and as such would -I be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. y rit t ho Au ng ni an Pl C C C rd erfo at W

The retention of the front boundary wall would give rise to a traffic hazard at this location because n the required visibility splays cannot be achieved or maintained at the existing vehicular entrance io due to the presence of the wall in its current form and position within the visible sightline. The ct retention of the front boundary wall would therefore be contrary to Section 4.4.5 of the Design pe Manual for Urban Roads and Streets (DMURS) and Section 8.7 of the Waterford City and County ns Development Plan 2022–2028 and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. -I y rit t ho Au ng ni an Pl C C C rd erfo at W