Refusal decisions · 5–11 Oct 2026

4Refusals
4Substantive reasons
0Verification only
0Document not published
0Portal unavailable
0Manual review

Refusal decisions · 5–11 Oct 2026

2 cards shown

Refused

9 Saddler's Place, Lusk, Co. Dublin, K45 YX25, Dublin

9 Saddler's Place, Lusk, Co. Dublin, K45 YX25

Fingal County Council · F26A/0451E

What was proposed

The development consists & will consist of: Retention Permission: 1. The retention of 7.2 sqm area to west side of garage differing from the garage footprint approved under Planning Application F06B/0617, and Planning Permission: 2. The reconfiguration of the garage roof to provide an additional utility room & bedroom in the current garage. The roof will be increased in height with 2 no. rooflights added to the south side of the roof (facing the roadway), 3. The construction of a dormer extension to the rear of the house to provide an enlarged home office & laundry room. Additional Information Received 12/09/206

Refusal reason

The proposed development by reason of its excessive bulk, scale and design would dominate the rear elevation of the subject property. The proposed development would directly conflict with Section 14.10.2.5 (Attic Conversions and Dormer Extensions), policy SPQHP41 and objective SPQHO45 of the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029; would contravene the ‘RS’ Residential zoning objective for the area which seeks to protect and improve existing residential amenities; and, would set an hugely undesirable precedent for other development(s) of a similar nature. The proposed development would therefore be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet
Refused

Shangarry, Falls Road, Rathmichael, Co. Dublin, Dublin

Shangarry, Falls Road, Rathmichael, Co. Dublin

Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council · D21A/0728/E

What was proposed

Permission for the demolition of existing two storey detached dwelling and construction of a single storey dwelling with a detached garage and separate detached playroom/home office as well as new sewage treatment system, extended access laneway together with all necessary ancillary works to facilitate this development.

Refusal reason

• The development has not commenced. The Application, therefore, does not meet the criteria set by Section 42(1)(a)(i)(I) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended. • Substantial works were not carried out pursuant to the permission. The Application, therefore, does not meet the criteria set by Section 42(1)(a)(i)(III) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended.

Official decision evidence
Open official case Not linked yet